Yes, we still follow F1 in SA. Sadly we are unlikely to host a GP again soon, because the current resist government only care about sports the black people watch.
Type: Posts; User: Jacquesvw; Keyword(s):
Yes, we still follow F1 in SA. Sadly we are unlikely to host a GP again soon, because the current resist government only care about sports the black people watch.
My apologies, we seem to agree then.
You people go on like Allison is some design god, but look at the flop he designed last year. Get real.
One man is not the difference between success or failure in F1, so don't worry too much about Allison.
But Ross doesn't like F1 politics and Bernie's job is probably 99% political
Why are drivers being discussed in this thread? It's annoying because this thread is about the car's development and now it's been taken over by pointless driver discussions.
We can only wish for SA to host a GP one day again, but sadly the politicians will never help fund a F1 race here:
1: They already said a few years ago that there is no future in F1 for black...
Now we have something to discuss for the winter, fantastic and it's good for F1 too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And that is steeling, because Merc owns the work he did, that's why they paid him, duh.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just for the record, I miss Max and Flávio and the sport can do with some drama again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sure, it would be nice to see some racing between fast cars instead of cars being lapped constantly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
Ferrari can learn allot about chassis development from Red Bull if they use the same engine.
It's obvious that people are scared ***less of Red...
In all fairness Ferrari can only benefit from a customer such as Red Bull, they have the resources and clever people to help innovate new technologies. Red Bull made some really smart innovations...
I'm not a Red Bull fan, I just think that they deserve a proper engine so that they can compete against the top teams. The more top competitors the better for the show add F1 is all about the show.
...
What?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not trolling, I'm debating something here. Does it matter how many posts I have? I read this forum at least one a week.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol, listen princess, if you don't like it you don't have to read or respond to it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't like the way you speak to me. Mods please look into this guy's attack.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm just waisting my time trying to explain myself here. Red Bull should just quit F1, so that poor Ferrari don't have to deal with stiff competition, because maybe they just cannot handle it.... the...
Nothing, but an equal engine means more competition and that improves the show. It's all about the show and currently F1 is not giving us that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, I get that, but F1 is boring when you have one or two top teams fighting for wins alone. Others should be in the mix as well and not a few laps behind just because they get rubbish engines.
...
F1 is about cars racing for the win, not about crippling your opponents so that you have an "unfair" advantage. There is no joy in winning when you did it by boycotting your opponents. Give Red Bull...
Ferrari should give Red Bull the same 2016 engine they use and just improve their chassis to beat Red Bull fair and square on the track.
If Ferrari cannot beat Red Bull on equal engines then they...
It doesn't matter if they won for that reason or not. If a Marussia finished last but still used an illegal tyre pressure they should be disqualified for doing that. Looks like you don't know how...
DSQ is the only fair punishment when an unfair advantage has been gained. It's impossible to know how big the advantage gained were, so you cannot punish with a mere time penalty.
It's also stupid...