+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 70

Thread: Ground effect, turbos set for F1 return - For Real?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    567
    TSN Cash
    10000

    Cool Ground effect, turbos set for F1 return - For Real?

    Ground effect, turbos set for F1 return

    By Jonathan Noble

    Formula 1 teams are closing in on finalising all-new regulations for 2013 that will likely see a return of ground effect cars and turbo engines - as the sport witnessed in the early 1980's.

    Several think-tank Working Groups have been set up to get consensus on moves to improve the spectacle of F1 and ensure it becomes more environmentally friendly.

    On the engine side, draft regulations were circulated among teams a few weeks ago and the latest plan is for 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo engines to become standard.

    The power units will be bolstered by numerous energy recovery systems, and should produce around 650bhp. Plans are also being considered to limit engines to just five per driver per season.

    In a bid to further increase F1's green credentials, teams are also keen for there to be a fuel flow rate limit - which will ensure the engines are economical.

    Williams technical director Sam Michael said: "Rather than dump as much fuel in as we can at the moment, there will be a fuel flow metre - so you won't be able to blow more than a certain amount of fuel. It is a good chunk less than we had at the moment."

    On the chassis front, Williams co-owner Patrick Head and former Ferrari designer Rory Byrne are working with the FIA to head up concepts for new car rules.

    Teams are keen for the cars to be better for overtaking than the current generation of machines - with ground effect being actively considered.

    "They are talking about putting a greater proportion of down force to the diffuser, a ground effect car - like the early 1980's," added Michael. "They have been looking at that, as well as increasing crash protection at the front of the car by moving the sidepods further forwards."
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/86341


    If this is to happen, I still hope we keep the same Ferrari drivers!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,668
    TSN Cash
    10000
    So 1.6 litres, 4 cylinders, only 650bhp, just 5 engines per driver to last the whole season... and you seem pretty excited about it?

    Given that, only a few years back, we had those monstrous 3 litre V10s, chucking out close to a 1000bhp, revving all the way up to 22,000rpm, and no limit on number of engines. I know which I prefer!

    The future is RED

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland / Hull
    Posts
    19,715
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Sounds terrible to me...

    Forza Ferrari

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Apeldoorn, Hollan
    Posts
    1,179
    TSN Cash
    10000
    650 bhp is too low, I am used to 900+ with the V10's :(

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    567
    TSN Cash
    10000
    I wouldn't say excited but looking forward to it. I would love to see the V10's back but we know that's not gonna happen because Al Gore said they would cause Antarctica to melt and drown the whole Earth. Racing will be leaning more towards eco friendly solutions in the future and this seems like a start. Who knows, lap times might be close to current F1 cars. I wonder when they'll introduce diesel in F1, kidding

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    3,238
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Ground effect seems like a clear solution to the overtaking problem, since it doesn't rely on having clean air flowing through the front wing, although I'm not sure if technology will allow a safer implementation today

    But everytime I hear someone talk about limiting the number of engine, I feel like grabbing that person's throat and punch him all the way back to the stone age. For crying out loud, why not make the drivers peddle the car instead.

    1.6 litter 4 cylinder, are they mentally handicapped?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    746
    TSN Cash
    10000
    going back to flintsones

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    2,532
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Geeze, they might even be able to keep up with GP2's

    He was the fastest driver I ever saw - faster even than Fangio"
    ______________________Mike Hawthorn on Alberto Ascari

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    897
    TSN Cash
    10000
    If the engines are reduced to 1.6 litres. That for me is the end of F1.

    F1 used to be noted for being the fastest most highly advanced technical form of racing.

    Take the wheel arches and body bits around the wheels off the boy racers cars and and insta F1.

    Maybe I could do that to my wife's Clio and convince Ernie I could be a privateer racer.

    That rule if it comes to pass is the END of F1, and motor sport loses it's jewel in the crown.

    Can they really let Indy cars become the ultimate racing machines ??
    Its all in the name - FERRARI

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,668
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Why not just stop the actual racing itself and do all of it on simulators?! I mean, all the big teams have got very high end simulators, just use those for some form of virtual racing! That will save a hell of a lot of money!!!

    I think the golden era of Formula 1 ended with the V10 days. We are now going to go continuously downhill. And Le Mans is now all about the diesels, so can't even properly enjoy that anymore!!!

    The future is RED

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    stowmarket
    Posts
    5,137
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    Sounds terrible to me...
    +1 mate.1.6 litre NO NO NO That isnt great, alot of road cars will be more powerfull than them. F1 should be about v10's or even stay with the v8's. Next yeat BTCC cars will have 1.6 turbo engines and WTCC i think that is still planned. F1 is the pinnacle of motorsport, bring back ground effect but keep v8's (as v10' will n ever make a return ) they should be the most powerfull, not just bit more power than GP2. (no idea what GP2 BHP kicks out)
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    stowmarket
    Posts
    5,137
    TSN Cash
    10000
    F1 should be a driving challenge for the drivers.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    EU
    Posts
    194
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Well I for one don't mind 1.6 L Turbo engine, I just don't like the 650 HP thing, as I can't see KERS or some other "green" thing giving 200+ HP.

    Don't forget that to this day the record (as far as I know not confirmed) is the BMW 1.5 L Turbo that gave in Q trim about 1500 HP!! That is 1 HP / 1 ccm...

    F1 should just be the fastest form of motosport and now the most green series in the world. People loved V12, hated V10's, then loved V10's and hated V8's...

    nuff said...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    INDIA
    Posts
    610
    TSN Cash
    10000
    damn!!....the FIA will be racing hybrids in a few days....we need pure racing cars which are at the peak of technological brilliance......that means 3.0l --V12's with turbo's and 1500hp.......hope my dream turns into reality.....emission regulations should only be applied to road cars.....thank you FIA.:p
    "I've always believed that you should never, ever give up and you should always keep fighting even when there's only a slightest chance"--MICHAEL SCHUMACHER

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,278
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_ani View Post
    going back to flintsones
    Sad but true
    Hero's come and go, but legends never die!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    front of my screen
    Posts
    90
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet View Post
    why not make the drivers peddle the car instead.
    Quote Originally Posted by ek583 View Post
    Why not just stop the actual racing itself and do all of it on simulators?!
    Please don't give them ideas.
    Please remember that I'm not a Ferrari fan. I always try to be as neutral as possible. Sometimes this will please you, sometimes won't.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,845
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by theforce View Post
    On the engine side, draft regulations were circulated among teams a few weeks ago and the latest plan is for 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo engines to become standard.
    I didn't know you could turbo charge a lawn mower engine.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,344
    TSN Cash
    10000
    The cars now are making 700 HP in qualy trim. Going down to 650 HP is not that big of a loss, plus turbos offer more torque than naturally aspirated engines. Which means cars will accelerate out of the corners even quicker. The 5 engines per season proposal is the only thing that gives me concern. If they allow the teams to change out certain high wear components, then it won't be so bad. The ground effects proposal is awesome though. That will make passing a easy compared to what it is now.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Abu Dhabi
    Posts
    7,294
    TSN Cash
    10000
    this is pathetic.. CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR GLOBAL WARMING!
    IT THE BIG FAT YELLOW THING IN THE SKY KNOWN AS THE SUN!!!

    because of "Global Warming" the Fun seems to be ebbing away out of F1
    Michael Schumacher - the best there was, the best there is, and the best there ever will be!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Iceberg
    Posts
    398
    TSN Cash
    10000
    I wonder what are these surveys for, they don't listen to F1 fans anyways.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    289
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by REDARMYSOJA View Post
    I didn't know you could turbo charge a lawn mower engine.
    Well, first of all, you can turbocharge a lawnmower engine.

    Secondly, as was mentioned before, back in the 80-s BMW was able to extract up to 1500 from their inline four 1.5l turbo engines in qualifying trim, so the engine capacity of 1.6 in itself is not a bad thing at all. The unfortunate part is that it would appear they want to cap the turbo pressure and the quantity of the fuel in order to limit the power to the rather ridiculous 650hp
    1:29:53.435 || 207.316 || 310.596

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Apeldoorn, Hollan
    Posts
    1,179
    TSN Cash
    10000
    GP2 cars and Le Mans cars also have that ammount of power

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Apeldoorn, Hollan
    Posts
    1,179
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by ales View Post
    Well, first of all, you can turbocharge a lawnmower engine.

    Secondly, as was mentioned before, back in the 80-s BMW was able to extract up to 1500 from their inline four 1.5l turbo engines in qualifying trim, so the engine capacity of 1.6 in itself is not a bad thing at all. The unfortunate part is that it would appear they want to cap the turbo pressure and the quantity of the fuel in order to limit the power to the rather ridiculous 650hp

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kitchener, CANADA
    Posts
    1,058
    TSN Cash
    10000
    does ferrari even have a four banger engine??? or we'd have to design/built one from scratch??
    .....i have a feeling that FERRARI F2012 will be a winner starting from Melbourne....and Alonso will finally get his hands on a championship winning car and clinch his third WDC!!!



  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    northern Californi
    Posts
    7,489
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by Raz View Post
    this is pathetic.. CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR GLOBAL WARMING!
    IT THE BIG FAT YELLOW THING IN THE SKY KNOWN AS THE SUN!!!

    because of "Global Warming" the Fun seems to be ebbing away out of F1
    Forza Ferrari 16/15
    27 -4 WC's 24
    Totus Tuus
    Pax et Bonum

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,134
    TSN Cash
    10000
    WHY WHY WHY all the Doon and Gloom people .
    Am a happy chappy if all this true and happens. 1st) slicks come back 2nd) no refueling 3rd) if all what is said is true Turbos and ground effect skirts are back 4th) In my dreams I know tracks will have less chicanes and am personaly hpoing they remove the one at end of tunnel at Monaco be like good old days.)
    Remember the cars of the 80s my all time fav Ferrari 126c turbo and the Beautifull REAL !!! LOTUS with the JPS colours (lotus 91).
    Am hoping if all true they will this time allow twin chassis if only allowed back then for the Master and Lord to develope it (LOTUS 88) realy have never forgiven Ferrari and Renault for getting it banned.

    Oh if this all happens then all Ferrari need to do is 2 things Upgrade the Ferrari 126c and Make an EXTREME effort to Employ the Service of 1 Gordan Murray as he is THE BEST in the Business now that sadly Colin CHAPMAN is no longer with us.
    BRING BACK THE 80s !!!!!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    stowmarket
    Posts
    5,137
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Quote Originally Posted by Raz View Post
    this is pathetic.. CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR GLOBAL WARMING!
    IT THE BIG FAT YELLOW THING IN THE SKY KNOWN AS THE SUN!!!

    because of "Global Warming" the Fun seems to be ebbing away out of F1
    +1.
    But the eco-heads find it easier to blame carbon dioxide.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Apeldoorn, Hollan
    Posts
    1,179
    TSN Cash
    10000
    I don't care about smaller engines with turbo or ground effect cars. but F1 cars should have more HP then 650. 650 is too low they should aim at 900+.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lubbock/Austin, TX
    Posts
    262
    TSN Cash
    10000
    If it's such a problem, why not just have power be regulated just by the amount of CO2 that comes out? If you set up a set amount of CO2 that can come out of any one vehicle and amount of gas each vehicle gets, but allow engine size to be disputed by companies, that may be more interesting than set sized engines. If too much exhaust comes out to be higher than amount allowed, DQ the car.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    28
    TSN Cash
    10000
    Turbo and KERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts