Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: A NEW F1: Broadcasts, Teams, Tech, Mngmt changes, Venues, FIA/FOM etc.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672

    A NEW F1: Broadcasts, Teams, Tech, Mngmt changes, Venues, FIA/FOM etc.

    Formula 1 now capable of 'internet' broadcasts with new technology Published on Tuesday February 14th 2017

    Formula 1 is now capable of delivering broadcasts directly to internet users following tests carried out in 2016.

    Work carried out by Tata Communications in conjunction with Formula One Management, which included a test run at last year's Singapore Grand Prix, has proved that the technology is now in place for 'Over the top' broadcasts, more commonly known as 'OTT'.

    This would allow for F1 action to be broadcast direct to a viewer via the internet, rather than requiring access to a particular television channel, which has been F1's mode of delivery for decades.

    Tata's managing director of F1 business, Mehul Kapadia, said a lot of effort has gone into removing the delay often associated with watching something live through an internet connection.

    "One of the challenges that OTT has faced in the past is that what you see on your television versus what you see on your iPad or phone would not be synced up," he told Autosport.

    "That was the one big technology challenge that we have worked on solving, and demonstrating that we can do it.

    "This was something we ran at the Singapore race and I would say the technology is now there to do it."


    However, F1 is unlikely to witness a quick shift to OTT as its main form of broadcast, with TV companies still paying high fees for exclusive rights.

    Kapadia added: "OTT has a couple of answers needed from a commercial standpoint.

    "It is a commercial challenge about whether sports franchises want to directly reach to consumers and then not have the scale that comes to them from broadcasters."




    While new F1 owner Liberty Media is unlikely to be able to create a shift in the championship's TV model in the short term, Kapadia expects plenty of areas to improve for fans in terms of the viewing experience.

    "Loads of opportunities are still there, and there are so many things that we can work on," he added.

    "The entire digital transformation that is happening, whether it is the way we work or the way we look at the sport, or how we interact with the sport when you are at the race track or at the stadium.

    "Whether you are watching football, F1 or cricket, the entertainment value is coming from being immersive and closer to the sport.


    "While some part of that immersion has been solved by what sort of data you can get on your second screen, fundamentally your primary viewing experience, irrespective of the screen size, needs to give you more immersion, more choice in terms of how you want to view it, and a higher degree of what data points you now want to look at.


    "We are looking at a 360-degree digital transformation that is going to happen, and all of it catering for fans."

    source: http://www.autosport.com/news/report...net-broadcasts

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    The Deal That Threatens Liberty Media's $8 Billion F1 Buyout

    Feb 14, 2017 @ 06:38 PM

    Europe’s governing body, the European Parliament, today voted for an “immediate investigation” into the takeover of Formula One auto racing by Liberty Media last month due to allegations that it broke the law.

    The European Parliament publishes an annual Competition Report and amongst the anti-trust areas referenced in the 2017 edition is the motion to back “calls for an immediate investigation into competition concerns arising from the Formula One motorsport industry.” The vote to approve the report was passed through today with 476 in favor compared to 156 against.

    It follows a formal complaint made in 2015 by two of F1’s smaller teams – Force India and Sauber. They raised concerned about F1’s governance and the distribution of its $903.8 million in prize money which is biased towards the top performers. An anti-trust investigation could lead to contracts at the core of the auto racing series being torn up if they are declared illegal. It would create uncertainty for Liberty and its investors about the structure of the business they have acquired but that’s just the start.

    It could also jeopardise F1’s future as its best-known teams, including Ferrari, have built their business models around the multi-million Dollar bonuses they receive. There is a real risk they could reverse out of the series if Europe’s anti-trust regulator forced F1 to balance its prize money payments. However, that is by far and away not the most serious implication of an investigation for Liberty. The validity of its entire investment in F1 could be called into question.


    The F1 championship has been held for the past 67 years but July 22 2013 could prove to be one of the most significant dates in its history. This is when auto racing’s regulator the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) signed a deal which granted it an option on a 1% stake in F1’s parent company Delta Topco. The FIA took the option up later in the year and bought the stake for $458,197.34 which was a bargain-basement price as it was informed at the time that it had a market value of $70 million.

    In 2013 the FIA issued three press releases about the deal it had signed which also confirmed the terms of its governance of F1 until 2030. However not one of the releases mentioned that the FIA had acquired the stake in Delta Topco which was later revealed by this author in an article in Britain’s Guardian newspaper. One crucial detail was yet to be revealed.



    The FIA didn’t acquire the 1% stake from one of the shareholders in Delta Topco but from the company itself which was controlled by the private equity firm CVC. It owned a 38.1% stake in Delta Topco, worth around $3 billion, and in order to exit through a sale it needed the FIA’s approval as it would involve F1 changing control. This approval came last month and it fuelled claims that there was a conflict of interest.

    According to a recent report in The Economist, discussions about the agreement with the FIA had been going on for around a year prior to the deal being signed on 22 July 2013. At the start of the previous year CVC planned to exit F1 through a flotation which would not have needed the FIA’s approval. However, a flotation became increasingly less likely over the following 12 months as F1’s chief executive Bernie Ecclestone became embroiled in a bribery scandal.

    He was accused of paying part of a $44 million bribe to German banker Gerhard Gribkowsky to steer the sale of F1 to CVC in 2006. On 27 June 2012 Mr Gribkowsky was found guilty of receiving a bribe and newspapers including Britain’s Independent reported that in light of the outcome“German police were considering whether to prosecute” Mr Ecclestone.

    On 17 July 2013 CVC issued a press release confirming that Mr Ecclestone had received a bill of indictment, in English, from the Munich Regional Court and this effectively put the brakes on the Initial Public Offering (IPO). It would be almost inconceivable to successfully float a company which has a CEO who is facing the possibility of jail time as a result of criminal charges for bribery.

    A spokesperson for Delta Topco told the Economist “there can be no inference” that the transfer of the 1% was an inducement to the FIA to approve a sale. It said “no such transaction was contemplated” at the time because Delta Topco was still “contemplating and preparing for an IPO.” The spokesperson added that the timing of the July 2013 options grant was not connected to the indictment of Mr Ecclestone but was “the result of a 12-month negotiation” over renewing the terms with the FIA.

    The case against Mr Ecclestone was settled in 2014 with the judge in Munich saying that “prosecution of the defendant due to bribery is not probable.” By then CVC had changed its direction. As the chronology below shows, CVC’s co-chairman Donald Mackenzie told Reuters in November 2013 that the company had “no plans” to float F1 in the imminent future. Instead CVC was considering exiting through a sale which is exactly what happened when Liberty offered $8 billion putting an $80 million value on the FIA’s 1% stake.

    There is no suggestion that Liberty wasn’t suitable buyer but as Forbes has revealed it didn’t make its first approach to CVC until September 2013 so when the FIA acquired its 1% stake two months earlier it could not have known for certain who would buy F1. What the FIA did know for certain is that its 1% stake came with the crucial condition that it could only be monetized in the event of a sale by CVC and this required its approval.

    The FIA knew that if it approved the sale it would make a net profit of $79.5 million on its stake and the only way it could get it was by approving the sale. CVC on the other hand needed the FIA’s approval in order to sell its stake and make $3 billion on it. Liberty needed the approval to buy F1 and it paid a total of $80 million in cash and shares to the FIA.

    Liberty is listed on the Nasdaq with the ticker FWONK and repeatedly disclosed in its filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) that the FIA’s approval was needed to close the takeover. However, it didn’t highlight the fact that the FIA has a stake in F1 and that Liberty would therefore be paying the regulator if it approved the deal.


    source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/20.../#570aa5ce1eb7

    another independent source :
    http://nesn.com/2017/02/eu-parliamen...nto-formula-1/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Pirelli: Don't blame us if F1 races are boring pub. Feb. 15,2017

    Paul Hembery says there will be no point complaining if the move to lower degradation tyres makes Formula 1 grands prix less exciting because Pirelli is doing what was asked.

    Pirelli has overhauled its tyre concept to reduce degradation for 2017, as requested by the new rules, allowing drivers to push harder in a philosophy that is a departure from the policy it has followed since it became F1's tyre supplier in 2011.

    Pirelli motorsport chief Hembery has previously said F1 could end up with processional racing this year because the rules shake-up, which includes significant tweaks to aerodynamics, will spread the field out.

    Speaking at an event in Turin to mark Pirelli's 110th motorsport anniversary, Hembery told Motorsport.com that if the new tyre concept does not deliver a good show, the blame should not lie with the Italian company.

    "You can't please everyone and you can only go in one of two directions," Hembery said. "We did something from the outset which was desired, then there was a decision to go in another direction.

    "We're just following what the sport asks us. All we ask is that they tell us what they want. There's no point in complaining that we deliver what we have been asked to deliver.

    "As a sport we're moving in a different direction, and if it works as people say then we should get good racing."

    While the modified 2015 mule cars Pirelli used for testing failed to deliver the required amount of downforce expected in 2017, the tyre supplier was able to fall back on simulation data.

    "The biggest challenge is if you don't have downforce, you might not be able to get the tyres working as intended, because we worked to a level of downforce given by the simulation," he said.

    "It's true the mule cars were some way off in terms of performance levels, but we do have the simulation data.

    "That's the question, how close will the cars be to that data – maybe they will have more and go much quicker."

    Hembery feels while there may be fewer pitstops, the change in the rules should create a situation where overtaking possibilities are increased.

    "We'll see fewer stops," he said. "That comes with less degradation. You come into the pits either because of performance loss [due to degradation] or wear, and in this case we are reducing both.

    "We'll see a lot more one-stop races but if we deliver with the aerodynamic package cars that are closer together, and the tyre's not overheating on the surface, drivers will be able to push and lead to a scenario where overtaking is improved."

    source:http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/pi...boring-873864/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,357
    I for one will not pay anything in addition to my already extortionate Comcast cable bill package for Formula 1 coverage, even it's "enhanced or expanded" especially in the
    (dim) light of the lackluster F1 of today. This is a microscopic data tidbit that Liberty won't take into account:) Just saying, though this may not be the best place to post.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,432
    I can only hope we fans will go from watching F- Pirrelli to F1 again . Tyres was more the topic than engine, areo and driver! They ran the show! I hope it really stops.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    FIA denies conflict of interest in F1 sale to Liberty Media Feb. 16, 2017

    British MEP Anneliese Dodds, who has regularly voiced her suspicions about anti-competitive practices in F1, recently put an extra focus on the sale, by successfully calling for approval for an investigation by the European Parliament, although it won't necessarily go ahead.

    She wrote: "There is also significant conflict of interest over the recent sale of the sport to Liberty Media, after the regulator received a $79.5million (£63.7m) profit from authorising the sale.



    ADVERTISING


    "I have written a number of letters to the European Commission calling for a full investigation and I am grateful that the rest of the European Parliament has added its voice to this call."

    The FIA has responded by stressing that it still believes that there was no conflict of interest, distancing itself from the commercial agreements between the Commercial Rights Holder and the teams, and pointing out that it could only withhold permission for the sale if believed that the CRH could not fulfil its obligations it went ahead.

    In a statement referencing the sale the FIA said that it "has been made aware of certain declarations and comments, clearly inaccurately informed or made maliciously, relating to this process. In light of this, the FIA wishes to make clear the following once again:

    "Firstly, the prize money allocated in the Formula One World Championship is done so in accordance with the bilateral agreements that exist between each team and the Commercial Rights Holder (CRH). The FIA has no knowledge of these agreements.

    "Secondly, there is no conflict of interest on the part of the FIA with regard to its approval of the change of control of the CRH which has been approved by the World Motor Sport Council taking into consideration exclusively the terms of the existing agreements between the CRH and the FIA and the best interests of the Championship.

    "As per the Agreements made in 2001 for 100 Years, the FIA could only have withheld its consent in the event that the change of control would materially alter the ability of the CRH to fulfil its obligations; it is obvious that the taking of control of the Formula One Group by Liberty does not create such a risk, and nobody has ever suggested a different view in this respect."

    In its conclusion the FIA said that it "would naturally be happy to demonstrate the absence of any conflict of interest to any competent authority that may so request.

    "Once again, the FIA looks forward to its collaboration with both Liberty and the Formula One Group to create a constructive relationship that will ensure the continued success and the development of the FIA Formula One World Championship in the long term."

    source: http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/fi...-media-874154/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Rumours of 4x4 F1 cars, FOTA reunion Feb. 17, 2017

    A new political storm could be on the horizon for formula one.

    The sport's new owner Liberty Media has been generally welcomed to the paddock, but 1996 world champion Damon Hill compared the company to "the Trump administration".

    "I think they're learning," he told the London publication City AM.

    The latest rumour flowing out of Portuguese media sources is that some in F1 want the controversial current engine regulations to take a further step forwards for the post-2020 period.

    Mercedes' Toto Wolff told German newspaper FAZ recently: "We have to look at how we can pull even more power from these hybrid engines.

    "Formula one is the fastest laboratory in the world and we must not abandon that."

    His comments come amid strong contrary opinions that F1 should actually abandon its 'green' credentials and focus more on the spectacle, with loud, fuel-guzzling engines in the future.

    But the Portuguese rumour is that the post-2020 vision could be of the existing traditional engine allied to MGU-H and MGU-K, but with additional 'hybrid' elements incorporating the front wheels as well.

    A source told us: "Mercedes and Honda would be keen on this kind of technology. Personally I'm excited about the prospect of 4x4 F1 cars."

    But a potential dispute over the post-2020 engine regulations is not the only future prospect. There are also fundamental disagreements about how the sport's huge revenues should be split, with some believing the current system is even "anti-competitive".

    Hill continued: "I think it is worth asking those questions. We do appear to have a situation where teams are favoured. Particularly Ferrari is a little bit more than everyone else and seems to get some sort of preferential treatment."

    Amid that talk, another rumour is that there could be a move to put the former teams alliance - or FOTA - back together, after it dissolved in 2014.

    "I created FOTA to ensure that the drivers were again at the centre," Flavio Briatore told Italian broadcaster Sky Sport 24 recently.

    "Those watching TV don't care if the engine can go to the moon or not. They want the drivers in cars that have more or less the same performance."

    source: http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns35783.html

    Its still a ways out and it is rumours but I can see this.....aside from the hybrid PU's()....only because there is only so much hp/ft lbs that a RWD car can put down on the asphalt....an extra 2 would most definitely help....from a luanch and corner perspective AND rain perspective. However there would be a increase in weight in an F1 car due to the transfer case.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Formula 1 is alive and well in Canada for the next 12 years!!!!!!

    Montreal extends F1 contract until 2029 Mar. 1, 2017

    http://readmotorsport.com/2017/03/01...contract-2029/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    It would seem Ron has higher aspirations on his mind....one of nobility? Did'nt see this coming

    Former McLaren F1 chief Ron Dennis takes up UK Ministry of Defence role: Feb. 27, 2017

    http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/...y-defence-role

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    HAAS not concerned about winning in F1 as much as PROMOTING his tool company worldwide:

    Gene Haas: Long-term F1 strategy not dependent on winning:

    http://www.espn.co.uk/f1/story/_/id/...endent-winning

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    F1 will not bring back V10 or V12 engines – Todt

    http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/03/0...-engines-todt/


    thats just great!!!!!!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    GP2 set to become Formula 2: pub. March 9, 2016

    GP2 looks set to be rebranded as 'Formula 2'.

    Ross Brawn, F1's sporting chief on behalf of new owner Liberty Media, told Sport Bild: "The ultimate goal is putting formula one, F2 and F3 all together" in the way that the MotoGP categories are layered.

    And that plan appears to be also backed by F1's governing body.

    In fact, it is believed an announcement of GP2's rebranding is imminent.

    FIA president Jean Todt told the Paris federation's own Auto magazine: "Rationalising the pathway to formula one has been a major goal of the FIA in my time here and the designation of a new F2 would achieve that goal."

    source: http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns35904.html

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    GP2 set to become Formula 2: pub. March 9, 2016

    GP2 looks set to be rebranded as 'Formula 2'.

    Ross Brawn, F1's sporting chief on behalf of new owner Liberty Media, told Sport Bild: "The ultimate goal is putting formula one, F2 and F3 all together" in the way that the MotoGP categories are layered.

    And that plan appears to be also backed by F1's governing body.

    In fact, it is believed an announcement of GP2's rebranding is imminent.

    FIA president Jean Todt told the Paris federation's own Auto magazine: "Rationalising the pathway to formula one has been a major goal of the FIA in my time here and the designation of a new F2 would achieve that goal."

    source: http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns35904.html
    At last some sense. But what about GP3?
    #GillesPerSempre #KeepFightingMichael #JB17

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Quote Originally Posted by Scuderia1967 View Post
    At last some sense. But what about GP3?
    GP3 to be F3.....along with F2.....then F1

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Garden of England
    Posts
    562
    F1, F2, F3 - just like the good old days.

    NB My first GP was Brands Hatch, 1972 so 'old' means 'old'!
    Give me strength!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,399
    Ah, you 'old' fart, prattling on about ancient history. (my first GP was Watkins Glen, 1971 )
    Forza Ferrari !
    "You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." - Juan Manuel Fangio

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Lisbon, Portugal
    Posts
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    GP3 to be F3.....along with F2.....then F1
    Only problem with that is F3 already exists, and their cars have nothing to do with the GP3 ones
    #GillesPerSempre #KeepFightingMichael #JB17

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Liberty Media considers more F1 engine changes, return to traditional venues ---------- pub. March 14, 2017
    Executive Greg Maffei says new F1 owners have plenty on the table

    Liberty Media boss Greg Maffei says that Formula 1 might need to make changes to its current engine regulations.

    Last week, FIA president Jean Todt ruled out a return to screaming V8, V10 or V12 engines, declaring it would "not be accepted by global society." However, the volume of the current hybrid power units remains highly controversial, which apparently has not escaped the notice of the sport's new owners.

    "Yes, there are some things to do around the engines, there are some things to do around the (drag reduction system), there are a few things to do to try to balance the amount of money the teams get," Liberty chief executive Maffei is quoted by the Spanish sports newspaper AS.

    He also said that moves are afoot to bring back some European circuits that have become lost to the F1 calendar.

    "There are always races that come and go, but it's more negative when it's a traditional European race, which is in the heart of the fans," said Maffei. "We have already started a process to bring some of these circuits back."

    And he said some race weekends must be made more exciting overall.

    "We will take as reference the best Grands Prix, such as Mexico, Singapore and Abu Dhabi, and bring what happens there to the traditional tracks," said Maffei.

    source: http://autoweek.com/article/formula-...itional-venues

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Liberty Media's Maffei slams Baku for adding no value to F1 --------- pub. March 14, 2017

    Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei believes Formula 1's race calendar should include races which enhance the sport's business and brand.

    As the new owners of F1 begin to frame the sport's future foundation, a rise of the number of races on the calendar is probable.

    But Liberty will also be aiming for quality along with quantity, working alongside promoters to improve events on all fronts, both sporting and commercial.

    "It's our job to do far more to help the promoters be successful," Greg Maffei said last week at the Deutsche Bank 2017 Media & Telecom Conference.

    "Frankly, Bernie's attitude was 'how much can I extract from them, how much up front?' - I heard him call them 'the victims'.

    "So we ended up with races like Baku in Azerbaijan where they paid us a big race free but it does nothing to build the long term brand and help the business."

    No doubt Baku organisers will be delighted to hear the unsupportive opinion of the man whose company collects tens of millions of dollars from them each year.

    But Maffei acknowledges the necessity to provide a cost effective product. Hefty fees are one thing, but it all must be made worth every party's while.

    "Our job is to have partners who pay us well but who also help us build the product. But it's incumbent upon us to bring best practice.

    "Some of the races which are considered the most exciting: Abu Dhabi, Singapore night race, Mexico City

    "What's going on well in those races ? We need to share that with the promoters in each of the cities where things are less successful.

    "It is both incumbent upon us to help but it is also recognising a new one, the first thing they are going to do is say 'I'm paying too much'.

    "There is some expected noise and we are working on trying to quell that and help them."

    source: http://en.f1i.com/news/261909-libert...-value-f1.html
    Last edited by jgonzalesm6; 15th March 2017 at 20:11.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    I like this guy already....this Greg Maffei.....bring back old circuits(European ones especially), do away with circuits that have no value towards F1....AND a possibility of changing the current formula of engines, aero and money alottment.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,399
    I don't know, I'll reserve judgement for a while. He talks a lot but like they say... actions speak louder than words. If they actually get races scheduled in some (or even one!) of the old European circuits that'll start to win me over.
    Forza Ferrari !
    "You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." - Juan Manuel Fangio

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East Brunswick, NJ
    Posts
    1,171
    Bernie is just a greedy old troll. He would milk a promoter for a few years, then when they wised up and tried to renegotiate he would drop them. That is how we got a ton of Tilke snoose fests in places no one cares about.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    672
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6TransAm01 View Post
    Bernie is just a greedy old troll. He would milk a promoter for a few years, then when they wised up and tried to renegotiate he would drop them. That is how we got a ton of Tilke snoose fests in places no one cares about.
    yep, not bad for a car salesman. He ran the venue's like a 5 star hotel.....want the service, you have to anty up otherwise don't even bother me.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •