Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: F1 conspiracy about Vet and Stroll crash

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berklee, Boston MA
    Posts
    593

    F1 conspiracy about Vet and Stroll crash

    Someone posted that the reason Seb slammed into Lance was to remove evidence that could show that Ferrari switched cars. Kimi was bullet-proof in quali but magically was unable to take the start, while Seb had gremlins all Saturday long, then had the speed to grab P4. It was implied that Seb switched cars to allow him to fight his way up the grid, sacrificing Kimi, who is not a title contender anymore. Due to the damage, Ferrari can skip scrutineering and have a free hand in dismantling the #5 car.
    #f1conspiracytheory

    The amount of coming from people these days


    "Always move forward, take it one step at a time, eventually you'll reach your goal and if you happen to fall on face your still moving..."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    S.A
    Posts
    4,612
    Quote Originally Posted by Rookie View Post
    Someone posted that the reason Seb slammed into Lance was to remove evidence that could show that Ferrari switched cars. Kimi was bullet-proof in quali but magically was unable to take the start, while Seb had gremlins all Saturday long, then had the speed to grab P4. It was implied that Seb switched cars to allow him to fight his way up the grid, sacrificing Kimi, who is not a title contender anymore. Due to the damage, Ferrari can skip scrutineering and have a free hand in dismantling the #5 car.
    #f1conspiracytheory

    The amount of coming from people these days
    hahaha the PLOT THICKENS!
    Singapore 2017 - Never forget how quick Ferrari can lose it all, be humble
    Be Realistic
    Forza Ferrari 2018

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    salco
    Posts
    1,491
    wasn't this conspiracy theory put forward a certain Spanish 'journalist', going by the name of Alessio Fernandez i think

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    9,356
    Quote Originally Posted by Rookie View Post
    Someone posted that the reason Seb slammed into Lance was to remove evidence that could show that Ferrari switched cars. Kimi was bullet-proof in quali but magically was unable to take the start, while Seb had gremlins all Saturday long, then had the speed to grab P4. It was implied that Seb switched cars to allow him to fight his way up the grid, sacrificing Kimi, who is not a title contender anymore. Due to the damage, Ferrari can skip scrutineering and have a free hand in dismantling the #5 car.
    #f1conspiracytheory

    The amount of coming from people these days

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berklee, Boston MA
    Posts
    593
    Yeah and that mercedes secretly has the FIA in their pockets. Hahaha!


    "Always move forward, take it one step at a time, eventually you'll reach your goal and if you happen to fall on face your still moving..."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    91
    There was saying, " The higher you climb, the faster wind blows". People's jealousy to Ferrari is hitting up to unimaginable level.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    2,850
    Honestly, this is the type of thing I would expect to find on CNN...
    Rest in Peace Leza, you were a true warrior...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Rookie View Post
    Yeah and that mercedes secretly has the FIA in their pockets. Hahaha!
    Oh not secretly.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    2,022
    Well, Ferrari must've bought Stroll as well because it was him crashing into Seb not the other way around.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    2,748
    it gets worse/hilarious/utterly ridiculous/monumentally mind boggling.

    Supposedly, Vettel was running out of fuel (they have laps times to prove this....never mind his tyres were giving out as he was trying to catch up to DR) AS WELL AS to why Vettel took
    the steering wheel???

    sidenote: I believe Vettel took the steering wheel to show the engineers that in the last two races...Singapore and Malaysia....it has a tendency of pulling left.

    http://www.planetf1.com/news/pit-cha...racy-theories/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,298
    I lol'd .
    Hero's come and go, but legends never die!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    19
    PU parts have seals with numbers that are assigned to a driver. Also cars are in parc ferme, so no one can touch them. FIA would know if there was a switch. It's just Brits not accepting Ferrari has the fastest car

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,425
    lol. Someone has a lot of time on their hands.
    Its a good theory, will make a great film!
    But i doubt a team as large as Ferrari wont risk doing nonsense like this. There is too much at stake.
    Silently, like a shadow

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,425
    Quote Originally Posted by springfield View Post
    PU parts have seals with numbers that are assigned to a driver. Also cars are in parc ferme, so no one can touch them. FIA would know if there was a switch. It's just Brits not accepting Ferrari has the fastest car
    haha.. true. It must be a real bitter pill. The car under SV was scary fast, and there are just enough races to beat LH; should he make a mistake/get a DNF. There are a lot of nervous ppl out there.
    Silently, like a shadow

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    towradgi beach
    Posts
    155
    Ridiculous ssssss▀s

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormy View Post
    Well, Ferrari must've bought Stroll as well because it was him crashing into Seb not the other way around.
    according the most honest sporting broadcasters sky sports it was Vettel who hit Stroll

    http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/124...crash-released

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    131
    You have to have an abnormally high credulous mind in order to give credence to such ideas...

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by ALO View Post
    according the most honest sporting broadcasters sky sports it was Vettel who hit Stroll

    http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/124...crash-released
    That's because the Sky Sports team is either totally ignorant to the basic laws of psychics or totally biased towards anything that might discredit Vettel.
    Either way they got it completely wrong.

    I'll explain, yes in the new video you can see Stroll not changing direction - true, but what is also obvious is that he's not adjusting his speed and steering angle to the fact that the corners is getting narrower and obviously what happens if you don't adjust your speed and keep momentum in the middle of a corner? Well, you drift towards the outside of the corner because of the centripetal force. So yeah, enough said about the Sky Sports armchair experts LOL

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    hull
    Posts
    446
    ? totally biased? And others are not?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    2,748
    Quote Originally Posted by ClaudiuCojo View Post
    That's because the Sky Sports team is either totally ignorant to the basic laws of psychics or totally biased towards anything that might discredit Vettel.
    Either way they got it completely wrong.

    I'll explain, yes in the new video you can see Stroll not changing direction - true, but what is also obvious is that he's not adjusting his speed and steering angle to the fact that the corners is getting narrower and obviously what happens if you don't adjust your speed and keep momentum in the middle of a corner? Well, you drift towards the outside of the corner because of the centripetal force. So yeah, enough said about the Sky Sports armchair experts LOL
    But its a cool down lap as nothing applies in a race. Stroll was ahead of Vettel, Vettel was behind Stroll both taking a left handed turn. Have we not seen drivers waving at the crowds or going off track to get closer to the fans while driving or doing spin outs. Even marshalls are track side waving flags or giving flags to the leader only to stop on the track to pick up the flag. Again, Vettel should have been wary of Stroll who was ahead of him as he was trying to overtake.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    342
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormy View Post
    Well, Ferrari must've bought Stroll as well because it was him crashing into Seb not the other way around.
    Well Stroll is ex Ferrari Driver Academy...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,726
    Remember the Seb, Kimi , Verstappen mess! Stroll want's to just be in with the top drivers! He is relatively new on the job.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •