Ferrari should return serve and ask for mercedes to be retro fitted with a monitoring device also why is it just one way traffic do you think the merc is all above board fools who think this is the case the only difference is ferrari have no xmercedes employees with influence and dont forget the big mouth party spoiler mentality.
Pretty much confirmed Ocon waved Hamilton through.
http://www.gptoday.com/full_story/vi...s_team_orders/
hockenheim 2018 / China 2018 : Never forget how quick Ferrari can lose it all, be humble.
Positivity doesn't win you championships, whining about people being negative makes you blind!
lol ignore the bitter old cows ;-)
Kimi did ok lap when LH pitted. Any other car but Ocon or Perez and we could have a chance.
But I guess Merc was counting on fact that they don`t have to race against other "Merc driver".
What a boring race. Even Mad Max with 3-4 sec faster car could not pass slower cars. Kimi haters of course keep telling how he should do this and that against 4 time WC in Merc car - in Monaco. What good he could have gained by destroying tires staying too close of LH? Nothing.
Never been in Monaco, is there really anything they can do to this track? Or is this going to be like this year after year.
The thing is, this is very very controversial. Yet no one from the press is pickng this up. If Charles would have let VET through which would have given VET an advantage over HAM and if Leclerc would have said this in an inteview, Sky and other press would be all over it..
It is illegal to do these kind of team orders in between team. It wasn't a team order because nothing was said, but he litterly says you shoudl ask the boss...
“The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few.” ~ Enzo Ferrari
If Ocon would have defendend, HAM would have lost time, probably not enough for Kimi do get the overcut but still.. HAM's strategy choice was stupid, unless they knew they didn't need to woory about ocon.. Why would you otherwise pit this eary and get in traffic if your pace is still decent...
“The Ferrari is a dream - people dream of owning this special vehicle and for most people it will remain a dream apart from for those lucky few.” ~ Enzo Ferrari
You don't remember what you have written yourself? From your message below:
"No it's not.....50% is the ICE......25% is the MGU-H=60KW & 25% ia the MGU-K=60KW...both totaling 120kw = 160.92bhp or 80.46 ea.
Also, DR was racing with 6 gears instead of 8."
According to you :) MGU-H 60KW (80bhp) 25%, MGU-K 60KW (80bhp) 25%, and ICE is 50% (which makes it 160bhp according to your percentages). So your total engine power for RBR becomes 320bhp.
Aahaha, why are you trolling so much? We all saw the smoke coming from the brakes before the crash
Why do you think more monitoring hardware is going to hurt us? You are suspicious we have an illegal car? I thought the FIA confirmed everything was checked and confirmed legal....
Sorry guys, anyone have a tyres photo after the race? Thanks In advance
Enviado do meu iPhone usando o Tapatalk
It looks like Mercedes gave in to FIA's requests to lose the MGU-H.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/merced...ing-the-mgu-h/“We have given up on some of the stand points, we have accepted to lose the MGU-H,” said the Mercedes motorsport boss.
“We think the [replacement] technology is a step backwards but in terms of achieving compromise for the benefit of the spectacle, the revs going up, the fuel limitations going – I think we will have a louder engine, we will not be so limited by fuel…
Interesting, by what I've heard it looks like Ferrari are in the same boat as well, so these negotiations for the 2021 engine regulations will go easier than previously expected.
It looks like we will have a simpler F1 where technology is not that relevant.
Last edited by Stormy; 28th May 2018 at 11:41.
You under the impression that a Ferrari engined team has never made it easy for Ferrari and harder for another team?
It’s the same with the engine clarification, for some reason a lot of you seem to think
1. It has never happened to another team
2. Ferrari has never asked for clarification
And on the sky thing, reading this forum, you think any media that isn’t kissing Ferrari’s bum is biased against them. How old are you lot
[QUOTE=Brembo;974772 I believe Max in Seb's car would have cut and beat RB to the win.[/QUOTE]
Max in Seb's car may hit the wall again.
Forza Jules
Sky have always been bias against Ferrari, and are more pro British drivers/team
Of course, being a British TV station, they are geared towards British viewers hence their stance.
But that doesn't make the bias untrue. It's very obvious if you listen to their commentary every race. Martin Brundle is probably the most neutral of them, but he is a former F1 driver. The rest are just idiots.
Can't remember the last time Ferrari's request clarification resulted in monitoring hardware being put on our rival's car despite the stewards admittance that there was no cheating.
Crofty is the most impartial commentator you could ever wish for, honest.
1. The monitoring is unique as they can not measure it in the normal methods so other monitoring needed to be added.
2. I can remember new tests devised to measure red bulls front wing flexing
3. Seriously you lot are under the impression, Ferrari have never requested clarification on a opponent, seriously.
Toto not even denying it
http://www.gptoday.com/full_story/vi...ers_in_Monaco/
We need to start using LeClerc to hold up our rivals while jumping out the way for the Ferrari's.
1. Go to Google (or probably any other internet search engine).
2. Type in the words "Ferrari" "Tandem" "Battery".
3. In about 120 seconds you will understand completely why Ferrari is having to add additional sensors and nobody else is.
Bookmarks