Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 181 to 210 of 239

Thread: Turkish GP 2021 Race

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    11,233
    Quote Originally Posted by DJTaurus View Post
    Also we must not forget that today Hamilton was schooled by Perez :P
    Yep, others did'nt think Perez would hold off Lewis.
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    Sainz was doing 1m35's after the pitstop when Charles was doing 1m33-1m34's with pretty much worn out tyres. After the graining phase, like everybody else, he was doing fast laps.

    That guy probably thinks that people here don't have access to live-timing.
    Leclerc was doing 1:37s jesus christ! See that difference? O_o

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  3. #183
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    547
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    Sainz was doing 1m35's after the pitstop when Charles was doing 1m33-1m34's with pretty much worn out tyres. After the graining phase, like everybody else, he was doing fast laps.

    That guy probably thinks that people here don't have access to live-timing.
    Yeah i dont even understand the hate towards Leclerc. Both of our drivers did a amazing job.

    Our car was 3rd fastest by a big margin and closer to Mercedes/Redbull pace.

    The only negative thing on this race is CS slow pitstop. I'm fine with the strategy gamble, Ferrari is doing everything for a win this year.

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,847
    Good race by Carlos, well deserved driver of the day
    Almost forgot he started way at the back of the grid

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    I want Max to beat Lewis. Verstappen high horse??? Really??

    I'm not criticising Leclerc's driving. I am criticising Leclerc and Ferrari for not pitting Leclerc earlier.

    Sainz had a solid race....from the back to finish in the points.
    I am not backing either Ham or Max, whoever wins deserves it but I don't care one bit, since it's not Ferrari winning.

    You were criticizing Leclerc's driving. If you were criticizing for that unnecessary gamble, then sure, I would've agreed as well. But that wasn't the case.

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Looks like I was the only one who actually watched the timings. Well whatever, Even comparing Hamilton, on which Leclerc had 14 seconds before pitting had cought him up after his pitstop. I don't really understand what is going on here on this forum, but yeah, keep your ignorance guys.
    You clearly never watched the timing after Sainz stop when he had to go through the tyre graining....but you call others ignorant.....
    Forza Ferrari

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    1,547
    Hamilton is wrong. He was loosing more than one second to lec. If he didn’t pit he would lost his place also to Gasly and Norris. Instead he is moaning like a baby as always.

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    11,233
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    I am not backing either Ham or Max, whoever wins deserves it but I don't care one bit, since it's not Ferrari winning.

    You were criticizing Leclerc's driving. If you were criticizing for that unnecessary gamble, then sure, I would've agreed as well. But that wasn't the case.

    You honestly think Ferrari has a chance of winning 2021????

    I was criticising Leclerc's tire strategy.
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    I am not backing either Ham or Max, whoever wins deserves it but I don't care one bit, since it's not Ferrari winning.

    You were criticizing Leclerc's driving. If you were criticizing for that unnecessary gamble, then sure, I would've agreed as well. But that wasn't the case.
    He also cheers when Red Bull overtakes Ferrari on track....
    Forza Ferrari

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Leclerc was doing 1:37s jesus christ! See that difference? O_o
    So was Hamilton, because both him and Hamilton were the last one to pit.

    The track was drying but still wasn't good enough for slicks. And new inters were overheating and graining. After the graining phase, both Lec and Ham were lapping faster.

    So yeah, it's not rocket science.

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    You clearly never watched the timing after Sainz stop when he had to go through the tyre graining....but you call others ignorant.....
    Did really Carlos at any point did 1:37 and 1:38 like Charles? If he did, then I missed that and it's my bad. If not... well my point stands.

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    So was Hamilton, because both him and Hamilton were the last one to pit.

    The track was drying but still wasn't good enough for slicks. And new inters were overheating and graining. After the graining phase, both Lec and Ham were lapping faster.

    So yeah, it's not rocket science.
    Yep, but it's easier just to attack Charles for some reason....
    Forza Ferrari

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Did really Carlos at any point did 1:37 and 1:38 like Charles? If he did, then I missed that and it's my bad. If not... well my point stands.
    No it does not, they did not pit at the same time and same track conditions.....
    Forza Ferrari

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    So was Hamilton, because both him and Hamilton were the last one to pit.

    The track was drying but still wasn't good enough for slicks. And new inters were overheating and graining. After the graining phase, both Lec and Ham were lapping faster.

    So yeah, it's not rocket science.
    Hamilton, as far as I know, managed to catch Leclerc and only then he started to struggle after being behind him. Charles was slow right from the pits. And even so all in all he gained on Charles.

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    113
    Hamilton should have been given a penalty for forcing Perez off the track... Seriously that was ridiculous

  16. #196
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    11,233
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    He also cheers when Red Bull overtakes Ferrari on track....
    Checo had a solid race.....defending Lewis was a good tire to tire duel and took advantage of Leclec's tire strategy.

    Sainz had a solid race.

    Give it a rest already.
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  17. #197
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    You honestly think Ferrari has a chance of winning 2021????

    I was criticising Leclerc's tire strategy.
    I said I don't care about either Ham or Max, who ever wins doesn't matter to me.

    And if you really were criticizing the strategy, then my bad. Yes, it was totally unnecessary.

  18. #198
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    No it does not, they did not pit at the same time and same track conditions.....
    Oh come on... the track did not evovled in such a hige way in those 10 laps. Don't go there.

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  19. #199
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    547
    Hamilton's intermediate tyres. He went to check them as soon as he finished the race

    Source : https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/st...96945395720192

  20. #200
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Oh come on... the track did not evovled in such a hige way in those 10 laps. Don't go there.
    Off course it did, look at Lewis times when his tyres grained....LOL
    Forza Ferrari

  21. #201
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    11,233
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post

    And if you really were criticizing the strategy, then my bad. Yes, it was totally unnecessary.
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  22. #202
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Hamilton, as far as I know, managed to catch Leclerc and only then he started to struggle after being behind him. Charles was slow right from the pits. And even so all in all he gained on Charles.
    Hamilton had gone from 0.8 seconds to 4.5 seconds within 5 laps, and he had the fastest car unlike Charles. Both Charles and Ham were suffering from overheating, and as a result, graining due to both of them being last ones to pit.

    And guess what, Charles did manage the graining phase way better than Ham even with a slower car.

    Again, your theories and criticisms for Charles don't hold any waters.

  23. #203
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    Off course it did, look at Lewis times when his tyres grained....LOL
    Look at Lewis times before he cought Charles! Jesus he was much much much faster than Charles when they pitted. He gained 5 seconds on him from the pits, while Leclerc was not able to make the tyres work. Then, after catching him he started to struggle,. That's the difference. AND Hamilton NEVER did 1:38.. ir 1:37... or 1:36. So where did the track evolution go? It got wetter suddenly for Hamilton or what?

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  24. #204
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by tifosi1993 View Post
    Hamilton had gone from 0.8 seconds to 4.5 seconds within 5 laps, and he had the fastest car unlike Charles. Both Charles and Ham were suffering from overheating, and as a result, graining due to both of them being last ones to pit.

    And guess what, Charles did manage the graining phase way better than Ham even with a slower car.

    Again, your theories and criticisms for Charles don't hold any waters.
    Just replay the live timing please. What you are saying is correct, but you are totally ignoring my point. I don't care anymore.

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  25. #205
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    32,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Look at Lewis times before he cought Charles! Jesus he was much much much faster than Charles when they pitted. He gained 5 seconds on him from the pits, while Leclerc was not able to make the tyres work. Then, after catching him he started to struggle,. That's the difference. AND Hamilton NEVER did 1:38.. ir 1:37... or 1:36. So where did the track evolution go? It got wetter suddenly for Hamilton or what?
    You have no clue, no point responding further, Ant Davidson just said the same on Sky, when Lewis pitted track was dryer so hurts the inters more...but what does a former F1 driver know about these things.....
    Forza Ferrari

  26. #206
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    547
    Fastest laps. Mercedes was 2s faster than anybody else..

  27. #207
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Just replay the live timing please. What you are saying is correct, but you are totally ignoring my point. I don't care anymore.
    And what exactly is your point? You wanted Charles to defy the laws of physics and lap faster with this graining tyres over those who already had their tyres under control? Laughable.

  28. #208
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,540
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    You have no clue, no point responding further, Ant Davidson just said the same on Sky, when Lewis pitted track was dryer so hurts the inters more...but what does a former F1 driver know about these things.....
    Wow... lol, well obviously. And that's why I ask why was Lewis faster in his slowest moments by 3 seconds a lap than Charles in his slower moments? More so when he stopped later. This is going nowhere.

    "If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees

  29. #209
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    You have no clue, no point responding further, Ant Davidson just said the same on Sky, when Lewis pitted track was dryer so hurts the inters more...but what does a former F1 driver know about these things.....
    Nah Charles just sucks....

    It's quite funny actually. The people who're hating on Charles today are the same people, who were blaming Ferrari for Vettel's spins.

  30. #210
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    9,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Wow... lol, well obviously. And that's why I ask why was Lewis faster in his slowest moments by 3 seconds a lap than Charles in his slower moments? More so when he stopped later. This is going nowhere.
    Yeah...Lew was so much faster that he eventually finished the race 4 seconds behind Charles.

    This is really isn't going anywhere.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •