Forza Ferrari
"And regardless of what else you put on, wear love. It's your basic, all-purpose garment. Never be without it."
Forza Ferrari
"And regardless of what else you put on, wear love. It's your basic, all-purpose garment. Never be without it."
Except it was never deemed illegal. It was a clever way of interpreting the rules. Remember, Ferrari's PU was under constant scrutiny the whole year and it was always cleared. But they added sensors and we lost the edge, that's the way the game is played. Same goes for all the bendy wing investigations etc. Find a loophole and exploit it until it's closed or no longer relevant.
Better hope Mercedes don't show up with an illegal rocket and the maFIA let them keep running it.
Congratulations to Magnussen on landing the Haas drive. At least they have secured a better driver than Mazepin and someone Mick can learn quite a bit from.
Question.... as there is a budget cap, how is it possible for one team to produce 2 independent chassis inside this budget cap?
[QUOTE=Tifoso Svedese;1053663]Better hope Mercedes don't show up with an illegal rocket and the maFIA let them keep running it.
Running it just until the last race and then do a " Masi FIA " ! Millions more F-1 fans watching every race as long as there's no 8 WDC.
Ok... that RedBull scares me
"If he can't do it with Ferrari, well, he can't do it." - John Surtees
So Mercedes' mirrors have been ruled legal by the FIA.
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1...egali/9043806/
At first I thought the issue was how Mercedes had the mirror mounted to the chassis (the crash bar), or the little strakes under the mirror itself (Green arrow). I felt those were legal. But now I see there is a clear wing profile above the mirror (Red arrow) that according to the rule book should be illegal.
LOL What a joke, but obviously not surprised because everything Merc does is legal in the eyes of the FIA. Ferrari's mirrors where illegal, but somehow Mercs are legal.
Mattia Binotto, in his meeting via zoom with the Italian press, had very clear words on the subject ...
"The FIA has always made it clear that the support for the mirrors must have only a structural function and if it involves an aerodynamic influence it must be just 'incidental'. If this has been the principle underlined by the FIA in the past, I believe it must be the same today and in the future, there is no reason to change your mind today. "
~FORZA FERRARI~
How can anyone (FIA included) argue with that?
If this isn’t fixed, it will be a stain on the fairness of F1.
-Lou(is)
Forza Ferrari 16/15
Totus Tuus
McLaren bagged a nice sponsorship with Google
Google joins hands with McLaren Racing to promote Android and Chrome
https://www.gsmarena.com/google_join...news-53597.php
Las Vegas looks to be 3rd on the calender for 2023.
Viva Las Vegas.
It's not how start but how you finish.
Looks like Seb is out of the first race for the Coof. So much for masks and being jabbed to the gills.
Wait a second, the mirror isn't touching the inverted L-wing, it seems to be supported on it's own and is just floating below it. The mirror isn't attached to that inverted L-shaped wing, but to the support that has a silver bracket immediately below it. That's probably how it's legal?
Rest in Peace Leza, you were a true warrior...
Why bother protesting anything about mercedes its a waste of time and only falls on deaf ears.Ferrari will beat them on the track this weekend they mercedes have loads of issues with there zero pod car.
Bookmarks