PDA

View Full Version : Pat Fry reveals 2013 Title bid went awry after Canada Upgrade Package



Muhammad Ansib
8th December 2013, 03:05
Ferrari technical chief Pat Fry believes it was the upgrade that the team brought for the Canadian Grand Prix that sent its 2013 Formula 1 title bid off course.

Fernando Alonso had hopes of the championship early in the year after wins in China and Spain, but fell away from the increasingly-dominant Sebastian Vettel and Red Bull through the summer.

Asked by AUTOSPORT what happened when Ferrari started to drop off the pace around June and July, Fry said the issue was more about a particular development derailing the team's programme than the much-discussed windtunnel calibration issues.

"I am not sure that you can say it was down to windtunnel calibration," said Fry.

"I think through the winter we had a reasonable development period and a sensible development gradient.

"The first race upgrade package worked quite well, some bits better than we were expecting, and we understood that a bit later on.

"In reality, there was a different top body we took to Canada that we were unsure of, and then that gave us a few issues trying to understand that.
If you would ask at what point did our development start rolling over, it was around that time I guess.

"When you are developing, if you have one thing that is not performing 100 per cent as you are expecting, what do you do with it? Because by then the windtunnel model has progressed and moved on and is four to six weeks ahead.

"So when you try to back out of something like that it gives you a load of other problems."

Pat Fry

Fry admitted that Pirelli's change of tyre construction for the second half of the year had also been a hindrance, mainly because the original tyres had coincidentally played to Ferrari's strengths.

"[The Ferrari] has been light on tyres and warm up has been a struggle, and if you get a tyre that is overheating that just helps us out so much more," he said.

"That is not a clever bit of design or simulation or anything, that is just the choice of the tyres. And as things changed, we dropped away because of it.

"But it is for us to try to make the car work with what we have got."


Source=http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/111773



Interesting the internal alarms went off very early in the season

Muhammad Ansib
8th December 2013, 03:09
this means that Ferrari were really worried right from start of June but Fernando,Stefano said in an interview that what amazed them the most was British GP during which the Aero Upgrade Ferrari had brought didnt give them the pace they had expected but internally they were already doubts from June onwards NOT GOOD, NOT GOOD AT ALL :ouch
but Still Fernando managed P2 in the race!

hrc5555
8th December 2013, 09:26
Yes, thats right. (except, P2 was down to luck)
After Canada and especially after British GP there was big panic in Ferrari but they were not allowed to admit that!
I just hope they understand before Singapore GP that the tiltes were lost. It could be possible that Ferrari gave up from titles after horrible Hungarian GP (true reason why Fernando wanted to leave Ferrari). If they did that, than after Hungarian GP it was all PR talk, allready developed new parts and parts for 2014 car.
I hope it is the case because than we could have an advantage in developement of 2014 project! :-)

Hornet
8th December 2013, 10:23
These days it's not enough to have a fast car in the beginning, but we must also have a strong development program. With testing ban, the development race today is very different and my guess is, Ferrari have not been able to adept to this new approach that depends a lot on off track simulations, such as computer simulation and wind tunnel. We must arrive at each race with new parts that are working. By the time we find out on Friday practice that the parts did not work, it's already too late. So the team must get it right during the simulation stage.

When we look at our competitors, Red Bull isn't the only team that was able to have a strong development. Lotus and Sauber manage to overtake us towards the end of the season which shows their development is working while ours wasn't. So it certainly isn't a Adrian Newey magic. There's something that other teams manage to get right while Ferrari couldn't, and I think is the simulation part.

wisepie
8th December 2013, 12:40
Good point Hornet, simulation and wind-tunnel woes seem to have caused too much confusion and no-one was able to find the right direction. Unbelievable for a team of Ferrari's wealth and experience when you look at the likes of Renault and Sauber.

Catalan
9th December 2013, 11:47
Sorry for the off-topics. 2 questions:

- Has the team announced who will be Kimi's race engineer ? ( I assume Alonso will retain Andrea Stella )

- Any news about Rob Smedley ? Remember that after Massa announced he joins Williams, there were rumours that Rob could be following him, rumours increased when one of the top engineers at Williams, Xavi Pujolar, signed with Toro Rosso.