Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: Rear Wings

  1. #61
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Midlands
    Posts
    2,228
    Originally posted by JustBringIt
    I'm still reading but I don't know if I agree with the diagram on that link. Isn't lift and drag usually given as parallel and perpendicular to the chord?
    If you look, Lift and drag are parrallel and perpendicular to the direction of travel of the wing (angle of attack) no the chord.
    Disclaimer: The views expressed by this forum member are purely opinions and observations and should not be interpreted as fact, or indeed as anything other than a cheap gag for my own amusement.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    42
    Ahh, yes. That's right. But I'd be a bit concerned about the plane that wing is attached to. It seems like its doing a bit of a nose-dive.
    My blood is high-octane...

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Midlands
    Posts
    2,228
    Originally posted by JustBringIt
    Ahh, yes. That's right. But I'd be a bit concerned about the plane that wing is attached to. It seems like its doing a bit of a nose-dive.
    Maybe its the observer that is actually at an angle (ie the bloke who drew it was falling off his/her chair)
    Disclaimer: The views expressed by this forum member are purely opinions and observations and should not be interpreted as fact, or indeed as anything other than a cheap gag for my own amusement.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    42
    Originally posted by coysht
    Maybe its the observer that is actually at an angle (ie the bloke who drew it was falling off his/her chair)
    I thought about that but if you look at where the weight force is, you'll see that its not like that.
    My blood is high-octane...

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    42
    Originally posted by coysht
    Since vorticity is only a mathematical concept used to describe fluid flows, I'd say no.

    Have a look at this description of how lift is generated:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lift_(force)

    The section on circulation explains how a vortex is formed in the boundary layer of the air around an aerofoil


    edit: i've made it link directly to the exact page i was looking at
    Ok, I've read that link but I'm not totally sure what it means without a diagram. It almost sounds like its talking about separation and wake at the trailing edge of a 2D wing section.

    Its interesting the bit on the equal transit time thing. I did have that notion in my head but I could never really understand why it was like that - clearly its not. But now I'm left wondering what does cause the air to be quicker on one side of the wing to the other.
    My blood is high-octane...

  6. #66
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    The Midlands
    Posts
    2,228
    Originally posted by JustBringIt
    Its interesting the bit on the equal transit time thing. I did have that notion in my head but I could never really understand why it was like that - clearly its not. But now I'm left wondering what does cause the air to be quicker on one side of the wing to the other.
    I could never work it out at school and stuff, then I turned out that it was wrong! (nearly the same with how an internal combustion engine works - only ever found one description of that, which is accurate!)

    I'll see if I can dig out the explaination I was given a few years back which explained it all very well.
    Disclaimer: The views expressed by this forum member are purely opinions and observations and should not be interpreted as fact, or indeed as anything other than a cheap gag for my own amusement.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •