Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32

Thread: New F1 tracks must allow overtaking - Todt

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Derbyshire England
    Posts
    904

    New F1 tracks must allow overtaking - Todt

    http://www.motorsport.com/news/artic...D=395094&FS=F1

    Jean Todt has vowed to push hard to improve the spectacle of overtaking in Formula One
    .

    "We need to encourage more overtaking," the FIA president said in an interview with La Stampa. "In Abu Dhabi it was impossible."

    Pundits were critical after the 2010 finale at the spectacular Yas Marina circuit, because Fernando Alonso was unable to pass Vitaly Petrov, while another title contender - Lewis Hamilton - could not overtake Robert Kubica.

    "I'm speaking as the president of the FIA," said Frenchman Todt. "Hamilton had fresh tyres and was 2 seconds faster than Kubica and yet he failed to pass.

    "From now on, before a new circuit is approved, we will evaluate the potential for the spectacle as well as the safety," he revealed.

    And Autosprint quotes Todt as adding: "In this way we have already convened a meeting with technical experts such as Patrick Head and Rory Byrne."
    Well the horse has bolted years ago so its a bit late shutting the barn door now.

    £100's of millions spent on tracks that are no more than watching formation driving! i.e it's like formation flying, you go very very fast and none of you change formation during the show!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    As said, when both Alonso and Lewis cannot get past a slower car, its a crap track. It was designed and built recently knowing what a modern F1 car can do and overtaking should have been designed into the track.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,464
    Agreed...doubt this will change.. rules need to be altered to allow car manufactures to build cars that promote passing.
    we're number one

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Piraeus - Hellas
    Posts
    1,656
    Put another to bussiness NOT Tilke then bl... bas...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,887
    Tracks like A1 or Imola for example are so simple, No need any long straights or weird geometric shape layout with all the technical corners bunched up together.

    Tilke just doesn't get it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    848
    This is why they should stick with the old tracks!! I miss the german gp (OLD track)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    F360
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari_Fanatic View Post
    This is why they should stick with the old tracks!! I miss the german gp (OLD track)
    They won't and their argument - these tracks are(were) too dangerous! sigh... If driver is afraid for his life then he had to choose a dif profession.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by ferrari4life View Post
    Agreed...doubt this will change.. rules need to be altered to allow car manufactures to build cars that promote passing.
    exactly. Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't we have those stupid tall rear wings this year to decrease the air turbulence behind the cars to promote overtaking? The ones that have no effect thanks to Double Diffusors being allowed which remove the benefit gained?

    The tracks are only half the issue.

    "Luna faccia schiaffo testa"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Tifosi View Post
    exactly. Correct me if i'm wrong but didn't we have those stupid tall rear wings this year to decrease the air turbulence behind the cars to promote overtaking? The ones that have no effect thanks to Double Diffusors being allowed which remove the benefit gained?

    The tracks are only half the issue.
    and last year, hasnt really helped at all. they should consult with the drivers, they the ones who has to race on them. Not the designers or promoters. All they interested in is how good they pits and grandstands look and pretty paint on the run off areas (car parks)
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Belfast, UK
    Posts
    8,498
    We seem to hear this every single year - "we must improve overtaking". So do it rather than talking about it!
    Forza Jules

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by steelstallions View Post
    http://www.motorsport.com/news/artic...D=395094&FS=F1



    Well the horse has bolted years ago so its a bit late shutting the barn door now.

    £100's of millions spent on tracks that are no more than watching formation driving! i.e it's like formation flying, you go very very fast and none of you change formation during the show!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    As said, when both Alonso and Lewis cannot get past a slower car, its a crap track. It was designed and built recently knowing what a modern F1 car can do and overtaking should have been designed into the track.
    "From now on, before a new circuit is approved, we will evaluate the potential for the spectacle as well as the safety," he revealed.
    How about some mid season testing on new tracks for an idea, would give better evaluation and the teams get a chance to test some new ideas ????.

    It could improve things all round
    Its all in the name - FERRARI

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken View Post
    How about some mid season testing on new tracks for an idea, would give better evaluation and the teams get a chance to test some new ideas ????.

    It could improve things all round
    What Ken, you mean actually use the TEAMS to concentrate on finding out what makes overtaking possible yet challenging and then use that as the basis for determining the rules and limits for development?

    Surely not!

    "Luna faccia schiaffo testa"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    1,331
    What Ken, you mean actually use the TEAMS to concentrate on finding out what makes overtaking possible yet challenging and then use that are the basis for determining the rules and limits for development?
    Ermm I dont think I mentioned anything about restrictions or rule changes, just looking for an advantageous way of a/ giving teams a chance to improve and develope new ideas if they need to mid season and b/ A realistic way to see if the track design can provide more enjoyable races to watch.

    Heaven forbid that there will be anymore rules that limit progress and better cars.
    Its all in the name - FERRARI

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    823
    bring back imola!! make another AVUS track or something like the old Pescara hehe... well not seein that happend tho but hope the new tracks are good.. the Indian GP Austin and the russian being the next to come

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Palestine
    Posts
    227
    It's Not About The new F1 tracks, it just only about Hermann Tilke and who become a poor designer of Formula One motor racing circuits and auto racer.

    It's simple we need new architect.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,833
    Quote Originally Posted by TIFOSI_FERRARI View Post
    It's Not About The new F1 tracks, it just only about Hermann Tilke and who become a poor designer of Formula One motor racing circuits and auto racer.

    It's simple we need new architect.
    I agree. Get rid of Tilke.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Palestine
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermann View Post
    I agree. Get rid of Tilke.
    yeah good point! but I belive that Mr. Bernie Ecclestone Strongly Disagree.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken View Post
    Ermm I dont think I mentioned anything about restrictions or rule changes, just looking for an advantageous way of a/ giving teams a chance to improve and develope new ideas if they need to mid season and b/ A realistic way to see if the track design can provide more enjoyable races to watch.

    Heaven forbid that there will be anymore rules that limit progress and better cars.
    I was in support of what you were saying

    "Luna faccia schiaffo testa"

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    279
    I'm sure i read somewhere that Hermann Tilke is designing a new track to promote safety in F1
    down the pit lane near the Pit wall there will be a zebra crossing to make sure the mechanics can cross safely, and there will be part time traffic lights at the end of the pit lane (and pit straight) to allow the cars to rejoin the track safely at peek times
    FERRARI In F1 =
    has the prestige and passion for Motor Racing that is unrivaled

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by Tifosi View Post
    I was in support of what you were saying
    OOPs sorry

    Dear me I am getting defensive in my old age
    Its all in the name - FERRARI

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermann View Post
    I agree. Get rid of Tilke.
    Get rid of him, and bring back ground effects so they downforce on the cars isn't so dependent on airflow over the car. Look at GP2; they use ground effects and don't have any problems with overtaking.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    6,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken View Post
    OOPs sorry

    Dear me I am getting defensive in my old age
    and i'm getting more sarcastic in my old age heheh Sorry!

    "Luna faccia schiaffo testa"

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    69 Avenue
    Posts
    1,159
    New F1 tracks these days are boring, too much runoff areas(with the exception of Singapore)...

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,887
    Quote Originally Posted by 996 GT1 Lover View Post
    Get rid of him, and bring back ground effects so they downforce on the cars isn't so dependent on airflow over the car. Look at GP2; they use ground effects and don't have any problems with overtaking.
    hmm, interesting. Had no idea that ground effect is still in use in today autoracing.

    If they are still using it, then I guess its safer now to use them?

    If thats the case, then F1 should really seriously consider bringing back ground effects

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    120
    I think next season we might be seeing more overtaking thanks to new rules, but more things are needed:

    1. Drop Tilke.
    2. Bring back ground effect.
    3. Bring back classic tracks like Imola (assuming they comply with safety regulations).
    4. Allow for limited testing during season (maybe something like 4 or 5 scheduled testing sessions per team, anytime they want, just like they use the engines now).
    5. KERS might help. Maybe some other energy recovery systems should be added.
    6. New rear wings might help. Also, I think drivers should be able to lower or upper the front wing as many times as they want.
    7. F-Duct should be implemented in a way the driver doesn't need to use a part of his body to use it, since that's the reason they banned it for 2011.
    8. Bring back refueling. I understand it's safier like it is, but now that you could even drive a full race with one set of tyres, pit lane strategies are black or white, all the cars have the same fuel weight and the only excitement is if they will be able to switch tyres in less than 3.4 secs... Refueling will spice up everything, since some could decide to go for 2 stops with less weight and overtaking cars with more fuel should be easier.

    Just my two cents...

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Brasov
    Posts
    88
    Do it like in WTCC, 2 shorter races with swapping positions till 8th place.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,756
    Are GP2 cars able to overtake on Tiike's tracks? If they are, then it's not the tracks' issue.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    4,931
    Quote Originally Posted by impactX View Post
    Are GP2 cars able to overtake on Tiike's tracks? If they are, then it's not the tracks' issue.
    i don't really think it is the tracks. i heard in the news that Yas Marina will be hosting a moto gp in the near future, and i bet that sees a lot of overtaking.

    I remember the 2009 Catalunya Moto Gp, one of the most exciting races i have seen, and it was at Barcelona, which everyone said was so boring on F1.

    I think we need to cap the influence of Aero on the cars.


    In Stefano Domenicali, we have a team boss who has proved to be a leader. - Luca diMontezemelo

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,887
    Quote Originally Posted by impactX View Post
    Are GP2 cars able to overtake on Tiike's tracks? If they are, then it's not the tracks' issue.
    Problem is on the other hand, we've seen overtaking at other track and not at the newer ones. Alonso managed an overtaking move at Brazilian GP, and so did many other drivers at that track.

    I think they both goes hand in hand. Tilke just have the ability to bring out the worse of our aero issues. One may think of it as an amplification of whatever problems we already have. So the track do play a role, though they are not the sole reason.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Apeldoorn, Hollan
    Posts
    1,529
    I am against this, the tracks shouldn't be build for the cars, but the cars should be build for the tracks!

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRebel40 View Post
    I am against this, the tracks shouldn't be build for the cars, but the cars should be build for the tracks!
    Sorry Red I find this puzzling, in that we would need 20 different cars for 20 different tracks ????
    Its all in the name - FERRARI

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •