I totally agree with Tobes.
Schumacher's performed great so far this year, qualifying well (out-qualified Nico in 2/5 races and had a DRS failure in Bahrain putting him out in Q1), racing well.
Retirement in Australia
Spun by Grosjean on lap 1 in Malaysia
Retirement because of a loose wheel in China
Started 22nd, finished 10th in Bahrain
Mistake in Spain
Out of the 5 races, 4 of them haven't been his fault. He was running well in Australia until the car broke down. Was in a good position in Malaysia until taken out by Grosjean. Running well, right behind Rosberg in China before the team forgot to put his wheel on properly. A pretty solid comeback in Bahrain after losing his DRS in Q1. Finally, a mistake in Spain (which was just a mis-judgement and a racing incident) where he hit Senna.
He's way behind in the points tables in comparison to Rosberg but that doesn't tell the story in any way. Schumacher's had no luck this season and only made one mistake (everyone makes at least 1 per season - Alonso spinning in Spa 2010 etc) so I hardly think people can say he's lost it because he's scored just two points.
Age might play a factor in some ways, but as Brundle and various others have repeated many times, he's still one of the fittest guys in the paddock and reactions were never his strong point. I think Michael has come good this year, in comparison especially to 2010. 2011 was ok, mainly the latter half but in 2012 we've seen a qualifying resurgence and solid race pace.
I think the story would be completely different had the car/team not failed him on 4 separate occasions. The points would look very different and so would people's views. Remember just a few races ago people were saying that he "was back" so it's pretty stupid to conclude everything from one mistake and the points table.
I don't buy into the whole 'age is a massive factor' thing. Damon Hill didn't start in F1 until he was 32 and won his Championship at 36. Schumacher won his final Championship when he was 35 - an age most would call 'old' for an F1 driver. People comparing Raikkonen's comeback obviously haven't got a clue. Kimi left when slicks, no TC, current Aero packages, engine regulations, KERS etc were already in place - little has changed since 2009. But since 2006, a lot has. I don't believe it should have taken him quite so long to adapt but it's still completely different from Kimi returning.
Michael will have had a lot more input into the Mercedes team than Nico, everyone knows what an amazing developer he is. They wouldn't be where they are now without Michael. He's loving his time back, more relaxed, happy, better media image...I don't believe he's going anywhere any time soon. I think that's a good thing.

Bookmarks