Stricter version of 'one move' rule to be adopted for Korean Grand Prix

[Rob]

By Jonathan Noble Saturday, October 15th 2011, 02:53 GMT

Formula 1 drivers will have to adhere to a stricter definition of the 'one move' defensive rule from this weekend's Korean Grand Prix as part of a process that is likely to put it formally into the sporting regulations next year, AUTOSPORT can reveal.

There is currently no official definition in the rules about what constitutes a legitimate defensive move - with the matter currently only governed by Article 16.1 of the Sporting Regulations.

This article states that drivers can be punished for causing an 'incident' - which includes if he has "illegitimately prevented a legitimate overtaking manoeuvre by a driver."

The FIA's Sporting Code also states that: "manoeuvres liable to hinder
other drivers, such more than one change of direction to defend a position, deliberate crowding of a car beyond the edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are strictly prohibited."

Despite the 'one move' rule being mentioned in the rules, there is no proper definition of what it constitutes - and what a driver can do after he has used his single manoeuvre.

However, there is an unwritten rule that if a driver returns to the racing line after blocking the inside of a corner, he must leave enough space for his rival on the outside.

Although enforcement of the one move rule has worked for many years, the issue was thrust back into the spotlight at the Italian Grand Prix when Michael Schumacher vigorously defended his position against Lewis Hamilton.

Despite not being given a penalty for what some believed was driving that pushed the limits of the regulations, there were times when he was reminded by race control to leave enough space for Hamilton.

Following the Monza events, moves were made to re-examine the one move rule - and it has subsequently been approved by the FIA Sporting Working Group that it should become a part of the regulations.

With input from the Grand Prix Drivers' Association to put together a rule that the drivers are happy with, sources have confirmed that the one move rule will now be put forward for ratification by the FIA World Motor Sport Council so that it can be put into the 2012 F1 Sporting Regulations.

The wording will confirm that drivers can make one move to defend their position, and must then leave at least one full car's width of asphalt on the outside (which does not include the kerb) if they return to their racing line.

Even though this definition is not yet in the regulations, AUTOSPORT understands that the FIA will adopt this viewpoint as a benchmark from this weekend's event in Korea.

As well as the tougher interpretation of the one move rule, race stewards have also been reminded in Korea that they are able to add reprimands to any penalties handed out in races.

With fresh scrutiny on driver punishment after Hamilton's recent spate of drive-through penalties, the FIA now reserves the right to start adding reprimands to other punishments, such as drive-throughs, in races if offences are deemed to warrant it.

With F1 operating a 'three strikes' system whereby drivers can be handed grid penalties for totting-up three reprimands, it means that serial offenders now run the risk of facing further sanctions.

Article 18.2 of the Sporting Regulations states: "Any driver who receives three reprimands in the same championship season will, upon the imposition of the third, be given a 10 grid place penalty at that event. If the third reprimand is imposed following an incident during a race, the 10 grid place penalty will be applied at the driver's next event. The 10 grid place penalty will only be imposed if at least two of the reprimands were imposed for a driving infringement."

The discussion about these extra reprimands came up as part of talks in the SWG looking into the possibility of a points system being used on superlicences, whereby drivers could face ran bans if they accrue too many offences. This did not garner much support, but will be discussed further in the future.


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/95369

[Hornet]

For some reason I'm not a fan of tightly controlling how the drivers race. As long as they don't run each other off the track, they should be free to race however they want. Not having the FIA choreograph how racing should be done.

There's nothing wrong with how Schumi defended against Lewis, that's hard racing.

[Rob]

For some reason I'm not a fan of tightly controlling how the drivers race. As long as they don't run each other off the track, they should be free to race however they want. Not having the FIA choreograph how racing should be done.

There's nothing wrong with how Schumi defended against Lewis, that's hard racing.

Im all for hard racing, but i dont like these sudden chop across the front of another driver at the start and try to run him off the track, or like the move pulled by Schuey at Hungaroring.

[schumi1]

I don't see this rule working.

[vcs316]

For some reason I'm not a fan of tightly controlling how the drivers race. As long as they don't run each other off the track, they should be free to race however they want. Not having the FIA choreograph how racing should be done.

+1

[Ferrari_Fanatic]

+2

[NJB13]

I'm pretty sure they were following this rule in '79 at Dijon.

F1 would be a lot better off is the FiA were limited to ONE act of stupidity per year

[sv_godspeed]

...let them just race - this stuff is getting too orchestrated. if we go on like this, F1 races will look more like WWE "wrestling" matches!

more and more, we are starting to support "cry-babies" (read Rubens)

[Jose Lorca]

Hamilton makes two moves - arguably three:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...rix/?t=121m08s

[schumi1]

let them just race