Thread: F14-T- Development & News

  1. #2011
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    EGYPT
    Posts
    749
    Quote Originally Posted by Alessandra View Post
    Was delighted to hear that the wretched last three race double points super idea had been abandonned until someone
    Pointed out to me that whilst the wording might be as I Understood it it could of course be that the last race still has double
    Points , just not the last three!
    Any thoughts?
    Yes, indeed the last race still has double points.

  2. #2012
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,288
    Quote Originally Posted by OSS EL BOSS View Post
    Yes, indeed the last race still has double points.
    Oh for goodness sake
    Thanks OSS EL BOSS

  3. #2013
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    390
    Pirelli announces tyre allocations for first four 2014 F1 races

    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/112738

  4. #2014
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Senna4Ever View Post
    Wow, new management approach: make a priority list and stick to it ...
    will take it with me maybe it can be used also outside motorsport business ...
    You and I can laugh, but we both know that not everyone gets that concept. It's easy to get distracted in any business and one of the key tenets in business is to stay focused on the priorities. Not every business can do this properly. I laughed too as it's just common sense on the surface. Cheers mate!

  5. #2015
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Ferrari F14 T - new front wing02 March 2014

    In the final Bahrain test Ferrari introduced a completely new front wing, different in all details from the previous version (inset). The endplate (1) is simpler, with a thin vertical slot, while the main plane is more complex - beside the endplate (2) it is more curved, with two slots to better direct airflow on the outside. The new upper flap (3) is an updated version of the one introduced last year in Hungary, while the new main flap (4) and the other two flaps also have a different shape. Finally, the horizontal plate (6) is different, wider but still with the middle slot.

    http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2014/0/1153.html
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  6. #2016
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Macedonia(FYROM)
    Posts
    701

  7. #2017
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,234

  8. #2018
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,072
    Quote Originally Posted by gjoko-mkd View Post
    Were the sidepods reshaped to accommodate better cooling?

  9. #2019
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,885
    It does looks larger. The cooling outlet around the exhaust was also expanded. (there were some pic online showing the back and the difference is quite significant)

  10. #2020
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    1,914
    Do we know when our filming day will be?

    Regards
    "If I was driving for Red Bull [from 2008] probably I would have more championships, but because they were dominating between 2010 and 2014 probably I would never have driven for Ferrari. I am very happy and very proud to drive for Ferrari, all my time there.

  11. #2021
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by gjoko-mkd View Post
    They're tweaking the shape to (try to) solve the airflow problems in that region. I always thought the RB7-like bodywork is the way to go and Ferrari are leaning towards that. If they don't get those sidepod exits out of the way, they're going to mess up the airflow to the diffuser.

  12. #2022
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    england
    Posts
    1,409
    The latest photo of the F14T shows the rear end not quite so compact, maybe Ferrari looking for reliability towards cooling, it is important we finish the first race with both cars scoring points.

  13. #2023
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,106
    Quote Originally Posted by Senna4Ever View Post
    Do we know when our filming day will be?

    Regards
    I think it's already done during in between of two Bahrain test..Correct me if i'm wrong

  14. #2024
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    102
    What do you think guys do in the first races?I am very glad about our reliability.I know it was only test sesions but it looks like we are not that fast as Mercedes and Williams.Our only hope is reliability.I can't wait for that race ! First GP is going to be great chance for Caterham or Marussia to get first points.

  15. #2025
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    on planet earth
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwi Nick View Post
    Were the sidepods reshaped to accommodate better cooling?
    I think what they are trying to do is to expell hot air in an other point of the car.The bodywork is larger in the upper part but more undercut in the sidepods area,while it could looks like they are searching for more cooling it isnt really the case,i think they have seen in the windtunnel that is more efficient to escape the air from the exhaust zone(like Mercedes,Red Bull and Mclaren) than from the sidepods like the Ferrari cars of the last years.Cooling requirements are the same they are just expelling it in a different way
    "Sebastian,Daniel is Faster Than you"
    "Tough Luck!"

  16. #2026
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    on planet earth
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbles View Post
    They're tweaking the shape to (try to) solve the airflow problems in that region. I always thought the RB7-like bodywork is the way to go and Ferrari are leaning towards that. If they don't get those sidepod exits out of the way, they're going to mess up the airflow to the diffuser.
    I agree that they are trying to optimise the shape in that region but it has nothing to do with the sidepods exit messing everything,every team has to deal with it,the F14T has the typical overcut shape or the latest Red Bulls,they are just trying to improve it ever more,but i believe we are already mighty in that region.Think about it,we have the smallest sidepods frontal area of them all and this means that you should see less coke shape because you are starting from a narrower point,instead of that the F14T has an incredible extreme coke shape in the likeness of the RB10 or the W05 but as i already told you with less frontal surface,thats amazing
    "Sebastian,Daniel is Faster Than you"
    "Tough Luck!"

  17. #2027
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    9
    I do not believe that ferrari is behind mercedes nor williams, they have not shown their true form
    Nothing is impossible even the impossible

  18. #2028
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Maributo Key
    Posts
    5,988
    Wow great pix. Wouldnt the nose dictate the airflow there to a degree? I actually thought we'd see a few nose variations during the tests, mabey they did, but they were subtle, but I couldnt find that in any pix.

  19. #2029
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ferrari Car
    Posts
    1,841
    Quote Originally Posted by raiden View Post
    I do not believe that ferrari is behind mercedes nor williams, they have not shown their true form
    Maybe, but the same can be said about other teams.

  20. #2030
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    on planet earth
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by mirafiori View Post
    The latest photo of the F14T shows the rear end not quite so compact, maybe Ferrari looking for reliability towards cooling, it is important we finish the first race with both cars scoring points.
    I thought exactly the same but if you look at different pictures from different angles you will see that even if the upper bodywork is larger the coke shape is tighter.They added in the sidepods what they have taken from the coke zone where they believe there is more pace to be found.
    Look at these pictures:
    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3697/1...a49bfda4_b.jpg New bodywork
    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7452/1...ae070221_b.jpg Old bodywork
    All rights go to Sutton Images.
    Last edited by RedPassion; 4th March 2014 at 17:03.
    "Sebastian,Daniel is Faster Than you"
    "Tough Luck!"

  21. #2031
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    england
    Posts
    1,409
    Quote Originally Posted by RedPassion View Post
    I thought exactly the same but if you look at different pictures from different angles you will see that even if the upper bodywork is larger the coke shape is tighter.They added in the sidepods what they have taken from the coke zone where they believe there is more pace to be found.
    Look at these pictures:
    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3697/1...a49bfda4_b.jpg New bodywork
    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7452/1...ae070221_b.jpg Old bodywork
    All rights go to Sutton Images.
    Yeah I see what you mean, can't wait for the first race to see exactly what solution Ferrari end up with, Thanks for sharing the pictures.

  22. #2032
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    on planet earth
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by mirafiori View Post
    Yeah I see what you mean, can't wait for the first race to see exactly what solution Ferrari end up with, Thanks for sharing the pictures.
    You are welcome mate,Forza Ferrari
    "Sebastian,Daniel is Faster Than you"
    "Tough Luck!"

  23. #2033
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    273
    Some rumours emerging that Ferrari used different timing spots on track to mask their true pace... I'm not sure what to believe given all the comments coming from SD and Alonso.

    If they prove to be very fast in Melbourne then they were clearly sandbagging which perhaps they are trying to do to get a favourable outcome regarding the turbo shielding issue and to have the competition focus on the developments of Merc and Williams who have been setting the pre season pace.

    Even if we are behind (which i think we are) the majority of the work to improve is around software (to ensure better power delivery) which can be updated throughout the season, and aero also which we at least have a wind tunnel whose numbers are accurate this time around. The only concern we have that we cannot easily address is with respect to our fuel consumption and ERS overheating issue rumours. If these rumours are indeed true then these will be harder to address without compromising other area's of the cars performance.

    The boys and girls in Maranello are no doubt very busy!

  24. #2034
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    england
    Posts
    292
    Ferrari has had a slight switch around in its management in recent days with the appointment of Antonello Coletta as the new Sporting Activities Director. He will report to Stefano Domenicali and the role seems to be similar to what other teams might called Chief Operating Officer. He will work alongside Technical Director James Allison, Engineering Director Pat Fry, Engine and Electronics Director Luca Marmorini and Production Director Corrado Lanzone, taking some of the administrative strain off Domenicali.

    The 47-year-old Roman has been involved in the sport since 1991 when he started out with the Forti Corse team in Formula 3 and Formula 3000. Two years later he joined Peugeot Italy as Sporting Director and moved on to Alfa Romeo in 1995. He joined Ferrari in 1997 as the coordinator of the Ferrari Challenge and then in 2003 was put in charge of the Ferrari Corse Clienti department, overseeing customer racing activities. This role has now been expanded to include F1 as well.

  25. #2035
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    wilderness
    Posts
    1,574
    Sorry to say, but even if we used "own sectors" for timing, it would only affect to quali simulation time.
    It does not make any difference to our not so great race sim..

  26. #2036
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by Winter View Post
    Sorry to say, but even if we used "own sectors" for timing, it would only affect to quali simulation time.
    It does not make any difference to our not so great race sim..
    yes this is true unless the drivers continually slowed in a particular part of the track on every second lap. Only then can they truly mask the long run pace.
    I find it hard to believe they would take this approach as there are so many things to get through that playing games like this hardly seems useful.

  27. #2037
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    16,718
    Once again. There is no such thing as sandbaging with very limited testing!!!!

  28. #2038
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    england
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferris View Post
    yes this is true unless the drivers continually slowed in a particular part of the track on every second lap. Only then can they truly mask the long run pace.
    I find it hard to believe they would take this approach as there are so many things to get through that playing games like this hardly seems useful.

    Agreed but they could have ran a performance programme without full out lap. They may have been focusing engine to optimise for race when cannot run full power due to fuel. No point compromising any part of race programme for quali get perfect race map or data towards it as doubt they would have got it yet. To check they run quali sim on race power, they run high fuel on race power then full power on heavy fuel. They have 3 points of reference so can then work out point 4 which will be full power quali pace.

    bottom line sort the car to be best over a race, it will quicker in quali but it will be what it will be with fuel out. Points on Sunday and optimum race performance is king. No compromise on race pace for quali.

  29. #2039
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Barbados
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by stefa View Post
    Once again. There is no such thing as sandbaging with very limited testing!!!!
    I think what you mean is that there is no advantage in sandbagging when you have limited testing, not that it cannot be done as clearly it can, it just wouldn't make sense to do it. And as Mark P just mentioned, if you want to hide your quali pace for whatever reason it can be done whilst still working out for yourself what quali time you could have done.

    All of this discussion is kind of futile anyway as there are bigger concerns that need to be addressed.

  30. #2040
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    england
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferris View Post
    I think what you mean is that there is no advantage in sandbagging when you have limited testing, not that it cannot be done as clearly it can, it just wouldn't make sense to do it. And as Mark P just mentioned, if you want to hide your quali pace for whatever reason it can be done whilst still working out for yourself what quali time you could have done.

    All of this discussion is kind of futile anyway as there are bigger concerns that need to be addressed.
    Do you think there are any serious issues. I know it's gut feelings but I do not think there are any serious unexpected issues. I think the recent test just may have shown who guessed closest to optimum engine maps and gearing for example. In Australia things can turn on there head as now they will be all crunching the numbers gathered on all areas of the cars and the optimum solutions will be in place for Australia. It will then be down to which cars are best and who can develop most. All we have seen thus far is who is closest to the start line and they will all be pretty level in development stages come the 1st race. Renault excluded as they appear to have deeper issues.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •