Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 250

Thread: Canadian GP 2014 Qualifying Thread

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Istanbul/Turkey
    Posts
    1,707
    Wow, that's strange. Really strange.


    Disappointing; 2009 to 2016...

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    540
    What the hell is going on

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Athens,Greece
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by NickEice View Post
    If Alonso really has a destuned engine to Kimi why isn't he behind him...
    Fernando's sensor got replaces and Kimi hit the wall at sector 1, Fernando said the lap was good.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosso Corsa View Post
    Maybe Ferrari saw from the temp data that the engine wouldn't survive. But yeah, lets make out the team are cowards instead.
    Are we building car for winter or something then? Or are our guys in factory drink too much with Kimi in house? The temps won't be lower then today in the coming races...

    IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT - ENZO FERRARI

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Well, to make parts that actually work for a change? Would be nice.
    they do, and well, but with higher temps, be a risk of DNFs. Less cooling less drag. If temps stayed as yesterday, we would of run them.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    33,954
    So if we ran the upgrades knowing full well that it would result in DNF would that be the right decision?

    Some people.....
    Forza Ferrari

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    Are we building car for winter or something then? Or are our guys in factory drink too much with Kimi in house? The temps won't be lower then today in the coming races...
    ok, what would you of said, if team say, we running new updates in race, with risk of high temps. Then we DNF, what would you say? bash the team again saying shouldnt of run the updates.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    So if we ran the upgrades knowing full well that it would result in DNF would that be the right decision?

    Some people.....
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    MALTA EUROPE
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    what do you all want? keep upgrades and we overheat the cars and have double DNF? man the team cannt win with you lot.

    The team saw heat issues, which didnt like the look of. They doing their job, the heat is bit more than we thought.
    +1.... Risk of loosing the engines must be high!...Kimi's engine was knocking in FP1...= WARNING!!!

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Istanbul/Turkey
    Posts
    1,707
    Some moderators in this forum must be some Ferrari mechanic.


    Disappointing; 2009 to 2016...

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    they do, and well, but with higher temps, be a risk of DNFs. Less cooling less drag. If temps stayed as yesterday, we would of run them.
    What higher temps? It's normal (even lower) temperatures for a summer time. This is lamer excuse then the wind tunnel one.

    IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT - ENZO FERRARI

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Bulvania
    Posts
    2,964
    KR should improve ASAP.
    "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    931
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    What higher temps? It's normal (even lower) temperatures for a summer time. This is lamer excuse then the wind tunnel one.
    The wind tunnel on this forum is worse.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Greig View Post
    So if we ran the upgrades knowing full well that it would result in DNF would that be the right decision?

    Some people.....
    What does floor has to do with cooling thoug? Engine cover, fine, even though it SHOULD have been designed to handle it in the first place, but floor? Eh, what?

    IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT - ENZO FERRARI

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by SinanOzerS View Post
    Some moderators in this forum must be some Ferrari mechanic.


    better than being a sofa racer and engineer.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    What does floor has to do with cooling thoug? Engine cover, fine, even though it SHOULD have been designed to handle it in the first place, but floor? Eh, what?
    the floor and engine cover is going to working together.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  17. #77
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    they do, and well, but with higher temps, be a risk of DNFs. Less cooling less drag. If temps stayed as yesterday, we would of run them.
    If that is the case it would have been wiser to use 1 of our cars with all the new parts. We could then use that data for evaluation purposes. We panicked and overlooked that option possibly. This isn't the first time we have done this. Frustration is completely understandable. I think we're playing it way too safe.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    India
    Posts
    314
    Where does pettel comes from each time

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by shamim179 View Post
    If that is the case it would have been wiser to use 1 of our cars with all the new parts. We could then use that data for evaluation purposes. We panicked and overlooked that option possibly. This isn't the first time we have done this. Frustration is completely understandable. I think we're playing it way too safe.
    loose 1 car in race and loose points for WCC. Thats doesnt make sense, sorry.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  20. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Istanbul/Turkey
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    the floor and engine cover is going to working together.
    What ? Are you kidding me ? You have no clues about it.


    Disappointing; 2009 to 2016...

  21. #81
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    33,954
    Quote Originally Posted by SinanOzerS View Post
    Some moderators in this forum must be some Ferrari mechanic.
    Another useless post.
    Forza Ferrari

  22. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    India
    Posts
    314
    Dyno tests are working

  23. #83
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    F360
    Posts
    746
    Exciting year, yayyy!

  24. #84
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by SinanOzerS View Post
    What ? Are you kidding me ? You have no clues about it.
    you would be very surprised my friend.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  25. #85
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    the floor and engine cover is going to working together.
    We are constantly changing engine covers on race weekends without a need for floor change. Well... after a bit of hope, back to "no expectations" mode again.

    IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT - ENZO FERRARI

  26. #86
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Bulvania
    Posts
    2,964
    From engineering point of view it seems a bit strange to put a lot of effort in designing several upgrades for a car and then notice that one basic element ie. temperature has not been modelled sufficiently or precisely enough in computer simulations or such. But better be safe than sorry.
    "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."

  27. #87
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    MALTA EUROPE
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by SinanOzerS View Post
    Some moderators in this forum must be some Ferrari mechanic.
    Some moderators in this forum must have some idea of what is going on.............You don't!!!!!!

  28. #88
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    F360
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    @tgruener: #F1 Ferrari running the old engine cover and floor for rest of Montreal weekend. New parts too risky with higher ambient temperatures.
    You can't be serious lol! But if you are, no wonder we suck so bad.

  29. #89
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    loose 1 car in race and loose points for WCC. Thats doesnt make sense, sorry.
    It's not like we're going to get lots of points without these parts. Points would have been minimal. You've got to look at the risk/reward ratio. We've played it way too safe but ironically when it comes to race strategies at times we opt to take an extremely risky race strategy that have cost us dearly. Doesn't make sense. We could have run our engine on a lower setting to minimise the chances of a DNF but which driver is going to be willing to do that? We don't have Massa anymore.

  30. #90
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brno
    Posts
    2,482
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    What does floor has to do with cooling thoug? Engine cover, fine, even though it SHOULD have been designed to handle it in the first place, but floor? Eh, what?
    I think the floor and sidepods are connected so they are meant to be used together. One without the other can not be used....

    edit: another words they work as a package.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •