Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: What You Think About 3rd Car on Grid

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Starbug
    Posts
    399
    I don't agree with 3rd cars, but I do think that customer cars could be a viable alternative. It should help reduce costs and open the door to more track testing. There would need to be rules to help keep competition and diversity. Part of the additional testing could be designated as car testing days where the maker and all customers share data etc. So for example, if Sauber Marussia and Haas were Ferrari clients, then some testing days would be run as join/shared data days. Teams would still have their private testing days.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,050
    I'm for anything that gets the garbage teams off the grid. Teams that have zero hope to ever fight for wins aren't F1 worthy.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    16,718
    Quote Originally Posted by eugene22n View Post
    I'm for anything that gets the garbage teams off the grid. Teams that have zero hope to ever fight for wins aren't F1 worthy.
    So, by your thinking F1 should have following teams:

    Ferrari
    McLaren
    Mercedes
    Red Bull
    Williams
    ?!?!?!?

    That would be very interesting... (Heavy sarcasm mode)
    Last edited by stefa; 9th October 2014 at 11:52.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    N. Delhi/Helsinki
    Posts
    5,124
    Quote Originally Posted by stefa View Post
    So, by your thinking F1 should have following teams:

    Ferrari
    McLaren
    Mercedes
    Red Bull
    Williams
    ?!?!?!?

    That would be very interesting...
    That will be painful for me to hear one or two of them being called back markers

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,702
    Quote Originally Posted by stefa View Post
    So, by your thinking F1 should have following teams:

    Ferrari
    McLaren
    Mercedes
    Red Bull
    Williams
    ?!?!?!?

    That would be very interesting... (Heavy sarcasm mode)
    Sauber
    Haas
    Toro Rosso
    The latter 3 with 2 cars of course.

    Plus I think that 3 cars deal could be a good thing, for the sport. I think that the teams that join this sport should be there if they can afford the long run and it's idiotic that the big teams should adopt to the constraints of the small teams.
    Perhaps what I am saying here sounds cruel , but in reality it's pragmatic, when for example Ferrari has invested (heavily) in its own private track, it's ridiculous for anyone to ask them not to use it, because for instance others don't have one; tough luck I say. Same for other big teams, should they have an advantage over others, they should be free to use it.

    That, is called competition, that drives this sport forward, and this sport is a sport that by definition is a sport for the few and not a sport for everyone.
    "If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari" - Gilles Villeneuve

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    406
    one car

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •