So if there is no bias, why do they need to see both drivers after the race before deciding? In Canada they handed out the penalty without talking to them. The video is as clear as it can be...
So if there is no bias, why do they need to see both drivers after the race before deciding? In Canada they handed out the penalty without talking to them. The video is as clear as it can be...
~FORZA FERRARI~
Another strong race for Norris, quite liking him
Forza Ferrari
Stewards are now just wondering if to penalize Max because the cars were about completely side-by-side. If you are a little ahead, you are allowed to push the other out with no penalty. Though I don´t respect that because the track is much wider than 2 cars and I´d like to see the drivers race each others following that track.
Losses in Bahrain, Canada and Red Bull Ring are very painful. Ferrari could have had three wins with luck, but I definitely prefer to see Max win over Toto Wolf's smiling face.
Still no news ???? Wowwww F1 at highest technology
I've always thought it was established you need at least half a car length. I recall that from Nando pushing Felipe wide when Nando was still at McLaren. He pointed to Felipe's front wheel mark on his sidepod.
Max had plenty of room on the inside, he drifted over and pushed Charles off. Same as Rosberg at Germany '16. Penalty on Max.
Don't play dumb with me. I'm better at it than you are.
Peter Windsor's thoughts on the #AustrianGP incident:
https://twitter.com/PeterDWindsor/st...55558419144704
Last race, ferrari doesn’t have pace on hard tyres.
The same case here. Somehow ferrari doesn’t like hard tyres.
Last race on mediums they had blistering pace, why didn’t they go for it ?? Just my thoughts
5_second_time_penalty_for_verstappen
Last edited by Raveen34; 30th June 2019 at 16:40.
Bookmarks