Hobestly, this burgundy red I don't like at all. I prefered that lighter red. Aby way it will be easy forgoten if ars proves to be rocket!
No!
It was way that rad way before
Attachment 7907
1985
1995
Change was back in 97
1881981.jpg
Same red until MSC retired
They used modified red to suit Marlboro since 1997, a more orange colour
I dislike this one, but anderstand that some people associate it wiht great results years, and like it
This illustrate how our attachement to the team can be based on differents things, starting with the period we started to support the team.
Leo Turrin reporting today that the word from Maranello is the power is there but they have some doubts regarding the aero of the car..... 2019 flashback
Since some of guys love to quote that troll, I mean "journalist", Turrini everytime. Maybe you guys should post some of his stuffs that turned out to be true.
Because some people here love to parade Turrini as some kind of Ferrari "insider". But I haven't seen any Turrini stuffs that turned out to be true. I remember his "insider" info regarding Vettel. According to him, Ferrari had offered Vettel 2 years extension in 2019. But that turned out to be absolutely hogwash because Ferrari had announced Vettel's departure mere days after Turrini's "insider" knowledge.
I want to believe all teams could have interrogations on where they are comparatively to others
But with all the work done, having doubts now on the concept would not be acceptable
They could have to pick some aero artifices right or left, but no much more
Can't imagine that
Back in 2017, when Formula 1 introduced new aero regulations, Turrini dubbed Ferrari to be in trouble. According to him, Maranello were in panic mode because the aero was subpar.
But the actual thing turned out to be quite different. The 2017 Ferrari not only had the best chassis, everyone also copied Ferrari's sidepod design.
I think it would be wise to ignore Turrini's gossips. He hasn't been right about Ferrari on anything. All his rumors are nothing but desperate clickbait attempts.
That's what he does. A big Ferrari insider who's not even employed by any major Italian/International motorsport news outlet, who hasn't been right about anything regarding Ferrari. He runs a blog site where he post some garbage regarding Ferrari and some gullible individuals swallow it as credible "news".
It's laughable to suggest that Team X got it right and Team Y got it wrong. No one has the slightest idea.
Ferrari signs a strategic partnership with Qualcomm Technologies!!
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1...ogies/7996567/
FERRARI FOR EVER !!!!!!!
The WDC isn’t the success of the team alone. It’s the team and the driver. Obviously you need good drivers to win the WCC but even this year the team who’s driver won the WDC didn’t win the WCC. By those metrics they are not the best team. With a team like Ferrari, if you’re not WCC you failed. Second place is first loser.
It's not how start but how you finish.
Have to say that I like this new look !!!!!!
FERRARI FOR EVER !!!!!!!
Yeah i would love a black and red livery! Awesome!
Yes. Ferrari is, without a doubt the most successful team in F1. That doesn’t mean that they have not had their share of failures. The two are not mutually exclusive.
And as I pointed out your being stupid to not count WDC won prior to the WCC even existing....but you feel free to consider Ascari's titles as failure....or you could just man up and admit you can't class them as failures as there was no WCC to win....
Drivers are very much part of the team, would hardly considering winning any title be it WDC or WCC as failure....but off course you just have to put the team down. Hopefully you tire of it soon enough.
Forza Ferrari
Bookmarks