Page 24 of 27 FirstFirst ... 101112131415161718192021222324252627 LastLast
Results 691 to 720 of 790

Thread: F1 2022 Pre-Season Testing Thread

  1. #691
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    222
    It is just testing but it is not possible to ignore what has happened all these years.
    Red Bull and Mercedes have proven that they are capable of completely changing their car and stay competitive. Our upgrades have always been small wings, and the car was upgraded slightly during the season.Every year in testing the car was the same as presentation people!
    Tire management has been a chronic problem since 2011. We constantly make cars that lag behind the hardest tires.Desicions were always not in the right direction!
    In 2009 we took the wrong direction..in 2014 the same ... in 2020 the same ... 2017-2018 ... ok but not enough.
    So yes it's not bad to be optimistic but let's have the worst case scenario again ... we're used to it.
    If this car is a failure, what will be the excuses again?
    I'm just a fan, I have no idea about aerodynamics or engineering ... I think I say things that most of us have thought.

  2. #692
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    France
    Posts
    968
    Quote Originally Posted by faloupas View Post
    It is just testing but it is not possible to ignore what has happened all these years.
    Red Bull and Mercedes have proven that they are capable of completely changing their car and stay competitive. Our upgrades have always been small wings, and the car was upgraded slightly during the season.Every year in testing the car was the same as presentation people!
    Tire management has been a chronic problem since 2011. We constantly make cars that lag behind the hardest tires.Desicions were always not in the right direction!
    In 2009 we took the wrong direction..in 2014 the same ... in 2020 the same ... 2017-2018 ... ok but not enough.
    So yes it's not bad to be optimistic but let's have the worst case scenario again ... we're used to it.
    If this car is a failure, what will be the excuses again?
    I'm just a fan, I have no idea about aerodynamics or engineering ... I think I say things that most of us have thought.
    The change is that now things are in place to face the competition. We have the tools working to develop the car, as Mercrdes and Rb have since some years. We still be a bit back compared to these teams when fully using them, but we can catch up. Have hope mate, we are starting to be back in the game
    Last edited by Gilles; 12th March 2022 at 21:48.

  3. #693
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    222
    We are all fans...we all love this team...Playing catch up seems already a failoure to me!
    Last time we really turned around a situation was 2006...
    Anyway lets hope things wont be that bad..

  4. #694
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Kiato-Greece
    Posts
    5,407
    Quote Originally Posted by faloupas View Post
    It is just testing but it is not possible to ignore what has happened all these years.
    Red Bull and Mercedes have proven that they are capable of completely changing their car and stay competitive. Our upgrades have always been small wings, and the car was upgraded slightly during the season.Every year in testing the car was the same as presentation people!
    Tire management has been a chronic problem since 2011. We constantly make cars that lag behind the hardest tires.Desicions were always not in the right direction!
    In 2009 we took the wrong direction..in 2014 the same ... in 2020 the same ... 2017-2018 ... ok but not enough.
    So yes it's not bad to be optimistic but let's have the worst case scenario again ... we're used to it.
    If this car is a failure, what will be the excuses again?
    I'm just a fan, I have no idea about aerodynamics or engineering ... I think I say things that most of us have thought.
    Also the reality is that ,IT IS WHAT IT IS !!! You ,me or anybody in here have no say about it that could make an actual change/good for the team. All we do is just nagging in here and this is annoying for some. It's pretty clear for me.I will have to accept it (if we again fail ) or move on and don't bother any more about races ,results ,evolution etc.
    FERRARI FOR EVER !!!!!!!

  5. #695
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    540
    According to telemetry datas

    * Leclerc opened DRS 50 meters late than his opponents (at the beginning of the flying lap)
    * Lerclec was the only car on full throttle at Turn 7 (impressive)
    * Redbull’s uses longer gear ratios. And higher RPM
    * Mercedes uses shortest Gear ratios. ( explains faster accelerations )

  6. #696
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    rehoboth mass
    Posts
    217
    not to worried mick ended the day 2nd fastest on the medium tire in a haas so dont get to worked up

  7. #697
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by PURE PASSION View Post
    Well there is also this point of view. (Not that i believe it, just saying that it could be a scenario, like many other even worsen for us)
    The reason why people thinks Leclerc was on lower power mode is telemetry data shows that Sainz was able to reach 315-316 km/s constantly while Leclerc reached 307 km/s on his fastest lap. And i aggre with that idea.

  8. #698
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,243
    So we have pretty good testing sessions. Car looks stable, pretty quick and we really didnt crank it up yet. But it's a failure because we didnt bring a Bspec car to 2nd testing. And because RB and Merc did they are automatically better than us.

  9. #699
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Silent Bob View Post
    So we have pretty good testing sessions. Car looks stable, pretty quick and we really didnt crank it up yet. But it's a failure because we didnt bring a Bspec car to 2nd testing. And because RB and Merc did they are automatically better than us.
    It is all about extracting car’s Max potential in the end.

    We always fell behind after summer break since 2010. Except 2019 and we all know how did that end.

  10. #700
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kanada
    Posts
    11,622
    Quote Originally Posted by djmorin27 View Post
    not to worried mick ended the day 2nd fastest on the medium tire in a haas so dont get to worked up
    maybe HAAS is the team to beat......maybe they were the real sandbaggers all along.....

  11. #701
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    12,595
    All performance data aside or what you make of it, one thing that has changed in this new formula for 2022 is that Mercedes as a team no longer leads in cumulative laps and mileage for all 6 days of testing.

    Ferrari did well....very well in cumulative laps and mileage to top the charts. "Head down and stay focused."
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  12. #702
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Posts
    2,172
    Quote Originally Posted by Silent Bob View Post
    So we have pretty good testing sessions. Car looks stable, pretty quick and we really didnt crank it up yet. But it's a failure because we didnt bring a Bspec car to 2nd testing. And because RB and Merc did they are automatically better than us.
    About sums it up, yep. You can also add how a Haas is faster than us now. 2022 is a shambles already; might as well focus on ‘23.

  13. #703
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    12,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Silent Bob View Post
    So we have pretty good testing sessions. Car looks stable, pretty quick and we really didnt crank it up yet. But it's a failure because we didnt bring a Bspec car to 2nd testing. And because RB and Merc did they are automatically better than us.
    Quote Originally Posted by killer View Post
    About sums it up, yep. You can also add how a Haas is faster than us now. 2022 is a shambles already; might as well focus on ‘23.
    It's testing gents, too soon to extrapolate anything really where everyone stands. We will know soon enough in the next 4 to 5 races and NOT next week due to one race. Qualifying is one thing and race pace is another.

    What I gathered so far during testing is Ferrari looks rock solid due to laps and mileage.....yes porpoising somewhat but they were trying various floors during testing.

    Mercedes looks bewildered.....not like the solid 8 years past of brutal laps and mileage. Massive porpoising as I'm sure they will rectify their problem in 2 to 3 races.

    Redbull looks like they have their act together...they seem solid.
    It's not how start but how you finish.

  14. #704
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    53
    Final results: https://i.imgur.com/QAgLKfQ.png
    For comparison 2021 tests: https://i.imgur.com/GmP0D9q.png

    Most cars in 2021 quali did not improve much compared to the tests.

  15. #705
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    10,319
    Quote Originally Posted by JacKy View Post
    According to telemetry datas

    * Leclerc opened DRS 50 meters late than his opponents (at the beginning of the flying lap)
    * Lerclec was the only car on full throttle at Turn 7 (impressive)
    * Redbull’s uses longer gear ratios. And higher RPM
    * Mercedes uses shortest Gear ratios. ( explains faster accelerations )
    Charles is also accelerating out of corners faster.

  16. #706
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,089
    Quote Originally Posted by ferras View Post
    Final results: https://i.imgur.com/QAgLKfQ.png
    For comparison 2021 tests: https://i.imgur.com/GmP0D9q.png

    Most cars in 2021 quali did not improve much compared to the tests.
    Looking at last year is a good example of how much teams can fudge around in testing.

    Verstappen test - 1:28.960 vs Q - 1:28.997
    Hamilton test - 1:30.025 vs Q - 1:29.385
    Ferrari test - 1:29.611 vs Q - 1:29.678
    Tsunoda test - 1:29.053 vs Q - 1:30.607
    Kimi test - 1:29.766 vs Q - 1:31.238

    So Mercedes sandbagged, Ferrari and Red Bull didn't. While lower teams like AlphaTauri and Alfa Romeo did hero laps that were probably outside the rules to attract sponsors.

  17. #707
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    towradgi beach
    Posts
    2,468
    Max,s fast lap was on the ragged edge redbull,can claim they have more beans may be but not that many more.Red bull and Max can say what they want we shall see next week.Ferrari playing there cards close besides we really are the underdogs are we not.

  18. #708
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Posts
    2,172
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    It's testing gents, too soon to extrapolate anything really where everyone stands. We will know soon enough in the next 4 to 5 races and NOT next week due to one race. Qualifying is one thing and race pace is another.

    What I gathered so far during testing is Ferrari looks rock solid due to laps and mileage.....yes porpoising somewhat but they were trying various floors during testing.

    Mercedes looks bewildered.....not like the solid 8 years past of brutal laps and mileage. Massive porpoising as I'm sure they will rectify their problem in 2 to 3 races.

    Redbull looks like they have their act together...they seem solid.
    /s, sir. ��

  19. #709
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    672
    Spot on. I like this post. Btw, I came across this video https://youtu.be/RyNy3YxdLLo . Somehow it looks like RB ‘kind of’ trying a bit like F1-75 with less radical undercut and more streamlined front wing on day 3. Everybody is copying everybody else, just like what Binotto said. And talking about radical sidepod, it looks like RB employs similarly sized sidepod as Merc, one being rather square, and the other being elongated.
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    It's testing gents, too soon to extrapolate anything really where everyone stands. We will know soon enough in the next 4 to 5 races and NOT next week due to one race. Qualifying is one thing and race pace is another.

    What I gathered so far during testing is Ferrari looks rock solid due to laps and mileage.....yes porpoising somewhat but they were trying various floors during testing.

    Mercedes looks bewildered.....not like the solid 8 years past of brutal laps and mileage. Massive porpoising as I'm sure they will rectify their problem in 2 to 3 races.

    Redbull looks like they have their act together...they seem solid.

  20. #710
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    towradgi beach
    Posts
    2,468
    So what have red bull developed them selves,looks like sweet **** all.They presented a shell on the redbull reveal day then copied ferrari and mercedes and bolted the parts on thats how this so called redcrap evolved.

  21. #711
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by paolo lalli View Post
    Max,s fast lap was on the ragged edge redbull,can claim they have more beans may be but not that many more.Red bull and Max can say what they want we shall see next week.Ferrari playing there cards close besides we really are the underdogs are we not.
    Yes, and Mick (with C4 compound) is only 0.5s slower than Max (with C5 compound) I have no doubt RBR is one of the fastest, if not the fastest. I think in quali we will see times under 1:30.500 at least. Maybe even under 1:30(depending on track conditions)
    Last edited by ferras; 13th March 2022 at 07:52.

  22. #712
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by SS454 View Post
    Looking at last year is a good example of how much teams can fudge around in testing.

    Verstappen test - 1:28.960 vs Q - 1:28.997
    Hamilton test - 1:30.025 vs Q - 1:29.385
    Ferrari test - 1:29.611 vs Q - 1:29.678
    Tsunoda test - 1:29.053 vs Q - 1:30.607
    Kimi test - 1:29.766 vs Q - 1:31.238

    So Mercedes sandbagged, Ferrari and Red Bull didn't. While lower teams like AlphaTauri and Alfa Romeo did hero laps that were probably outside the rules to attract sponsors.
    If i remember correctly, they had a very sandy or windy track in last year’s quali. That’s why they couldn't improve. And Mercedes had more problems in tests than others.
    Last edited by ferras; 13th March 2022 at 07:13.

  23. #713
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Race Track
    Posts
    131

  24. #714
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by jgonzalesm6 View Post
    All performance data aside or what you make of it, one thing that has changed in this new formula for 2022 is that Mercedes as a team no longer leads in cumulative laps and mileage for all 6 days of testing.

    Ferrari did well....very well in cumulative laps and mileage to top the charts. "Head down and stay focused."
    Probably the best reply to date in this thread. Thanks jgonzalesm6

    For me, i only looked at the lap counts completed by Ferrari. That was impressive!.

    As for some of the comments of ruling out Ferrari already, Some of You guys clearly don't understand TESTING!, Yes we had a hard time the last 2 years, i get that. But can we all just take a chill pill and back our boys for just once!!!

    If they fail this year , i will personally stand up and admit that we got it wrong. But for now, Lets leave it and rather wait for next weekend.
    Drive it like you stole it!

  25. #715
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Corpus Christi Tx
    Posts
    12,595
    Quote Originally Posted by killer View Post
    /s, sir. ��
    Quote Originally Posted by paneristi View Post
    Spot on. I like this post. .
    Quote Originally Posted by Super M View Post
    Probably the best reply to date in this thread. Thanks jgonzalesm6


    It's not how start but how you finish.

  26. #716
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    53
    Quote Originally Posted by Super M View Post

    If they fail this year , i will personally stand up and admit that we got it wrong. But for now, Lets leave it and rather wait for next weekend.
    I hear this almost every year

  27. #717
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    702
    I saw a post in another forum, with Binotto saying to an Italian journalist:
    "You always ask me what Leclerc with do if we give him the car, now he has the car, let's see".

    If this is true, I think is says everything we need to know until next week.

  28. #718
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    551
    Quote Originally Posted by ferras View Post
    I hear this almost every year

    Problem is, it's getting long in the tooth.

    I still have faith
    Drive it like you stole it!

  29. #719
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Worcestershire
    Posts
    243
    Thanks. A real analysis. I think we look very very good for the star of the season. We are not the best but not far off. If Haas performance is anything to go by, we should have plenty more performance to show in qualy mode. While Merc is playing silly games, they still do have some issues to sort, and we can steal some early points off them. Red bull have solved all their issues with one update, if we find that kind of fix for the bouncing, I think we could do really well. Ferrari have worked well and I don't have the negative sense that usually accompanies a start of the season.

    Forza Ferrari Sempre

  30. #720
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by SS454 View Post
    Looking at last year is a good example of how much teams can fudge around in testing.

    Verstappen test - 1:28.960 vs Q - 1:28.997
    Hamilton test - 1:30.025 vs Q - 1:29.385
    Ferrari test - 1:29.611 vs Q - 1:29.678
    Tsunoda test - 1:29.053 vs Q - 1:30.607
    Kimi test - 1:29.766 vs Q - 1:31.238

    So Mercedes sandbagged, Ferrari and Red Bull didn't. While lower teams like AlphaTauri and Alfa Romeo did hero laps that were probably outside the rules to attract sponsors.
    Weren't those tyres in testing set on the softest compounds though? If it's like this year then this softest compound will be the C3 for the race and not the C5. So for example Verstappen matched his test time last season on a compound two steps harder for Qualifying in 2021?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •