Hmmm, we'll see. Last year even with a car that was clearly flawed, Charles qualified a tenth behind Max without doing the 2nd flying lap, and would've finished P3 if not for the reliability.
I don't know where we're right now, but I do know that the SF24 is a much better car than the SF23.
133 laps for the SF24 today. Good reliability.![]()
Let's go P2 this year
HAAS tops out the day with most laps at 148. So both Ferrari and HAAS got good info regarding engine reliability.
It's not how start but how you finish.
I'm conflicted because I'm glad this years car seems like a definite improvement over last years, more predictable for the drivers is great because I imagine having such a lack of confidence in the car last year really compromised our drivers as well as obviously the tyre wear issue.
I do have this feeling in the pit of my stomach though like with the Mercedes in 2014 with Red Bull though.
https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-onb...-fuel-testing/
i dont know but this sounds pretty good for me...
from the top speeds posted above RB maybe run higher engine modes, thus the difference.
That sounds really promising
“Ferrari, the first day of the SF-24 was more consistent than many months with the 23. Telemetry shows reduced power and high loads, no work on performance, however the improvement on degradation is considered significant”
https://x.com/giulyduchessa/status/1...fgIER3ucQ6m7KA
~FORZA FERRARI~
https://formu1a.uno/ferrari-bahrain-...bile-del-2023/
Very positive. The SF24 is a massive step forward over the SF23 everywhere, even in slow speed corners.
Ferrari will not raise the engine mode during the testing.
A positive start for Charles
1:31.7 for goodmorning from Lec.
Good sign, but he lost 2 tenths in S3 . Where the tires gone?????
Charles's times before the RF:
1:38.837
1:38.787
1:38.985
1:38.959
1:38.777
His tyres were 6 laps older at the start of the stint.
Morning session wont be resumed. What a joke, vital test time down the drain (no pun intended!)
Bookmarks