I think the gain is more down to the track we where very slow in the slow corners in Singapore and Russia and we never got to show our full potential in Japan with the awful Q3 and both drivers having damage during the race. COTA is a fast flowing track like Spa and Sliverstone and that seems to suit our car.
Naaah, Mercs were'nt taken it easy. Q1 results of the top 4 were super tight between the times. We played around with the updates during FP's and we were'nt satisfied with the data...so we reverted to plan b which worked out. Then you throw in the track which is smooth and free flowing and everything, at this point, worked out.
Honestly, with all the inclement weather yesterday and possible inclement weather today I thought we were'nt gonna get dialed in for the race.
It's not how start but how you finish.
So the SF-24 has been a decent car. Lets hope that the totally redesigned from the ground up SF-25 contender will be a beast that will give us tifosi something to smile about.
So the SF-24 has been a decent car. Lets hope that the totally redesigned from the ground up SF-25 contender will be a beast that will give us tifosi something to smile about.
Obviously Merc took it easy and will do so until the end of the season not blow any engines or have other technical issues. They will win the WCC even by finishing 3-4 in every race if Ferrari score four 1-2 in a row (which obviously will not happen).
There's no other explanation because why have Ferrari then been so far behind starting in Singapore and now there's almost nothing between both teams? A bargeboard update can't be worth 0,6-0,8 second. Merc didn't bring anything new that could be a step backwards.
Qualifying Max. speeds :
-Kimi fastest on the speed trap: 327.8kph
-Kimi reached top speed also at the end of S2 & S3
-Mercedes 4kph slower than Ferrari on the straights
-Renault engine weaker than Honda in qualifying
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp_Iot0XgAAzFZs.jpg
Qualifying Best sectors vs. Fastest laptimes set :
- Seb fastest in S1, Lewis in S2 & S3
- LeClerc had potential to end up P6
- just 0.6s covers P6 - P14, very tight midfield battles
- only Williams slower than Mclaren
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp_HGk8XgAASKod.jpg
Grid after Seb's penalty
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp-9jn0XQAUTV5u.jpg
It's not how start but how you finish.
...and LH has technical problems and must stop the race.
Saw quali just now.... damn we are close. Car looks back to the form out of those corners. Such a shame vettel got penalty else we would have seen vet vs ham battle.
Hopefully next race it’s dry where we can evaluate new floor etc...!!
Ham did run extra lap on those SS tyres, would he be on disadvantage ??? P5 vettel should be on clean side with more grip.
Vettel yet to win from grid slot lower than P3... but maybe today is the day. He must win today's race.
(yesterday) No further action against both [cough] Mercedes drivers after an FIA investigation into driving too slowly on an in lap, so no change to the grid.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp_fJAOWoAAV8qW.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dp_fJAPWkAAXz0k.jpg
It's not how start but how you finish.
Don't know if it was posted. They should have done this a while ago... now it's too late.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13...ecent-upgrades
Sent from my Galaxy Note9 using Tapatalk
So now there are rumors the "system" was turned back on at both some laps in FP3 and during qualifying (an even more aggressive mapping). That possibility or that merc turned down their PUs in order to be sure of no mechanical failures are the only logical explanation of the close gap yesterday. Ferrari was uncompetitive pre Suzuka and that's basicly what they are running on the cars, in terms of aero (except for new bargeboards). The gap between Lewis and Bottas in basicly the same as when Lewis is the quicker one (no mistakes then by any driver). New lap record was set numerous times in Q3 so that could indicate Merc was running at full speed.
More quesyion arise then. If the above is a correct analysis. Have Ferrari ben told by the FIA they can turn on the system again now that both championships are basicly over? Or are Ferrari just giving the FIA the finger? If the latter is true maybe they are doing that to force a written clarification? That should obviously be pretty important prior to next year. I watched a re-run of FP3 and the car looked great exiting T1, T11, the T12-16 complex and the last corner. Like pre summer break.
hockenheim 2018 / China 2018 : Never forget how quick Ferrari can lose it all, be humble.
Positivity doesn't win you championships, whining about people being negative makes you blind!
lol ignore the bitter old cows ;-)
So the SF-24 has been a decent car. Lets hope that the totally redesigned from the ground up SF-25 contender will be a beast that will give us tifosi something to smile about.
Well, that doesn't make sense because if it was true they could just change the engine, take the penalty and be as competitive again at the following race. Also, coming through the traffic during the race, when they drop to the back, would also be easier. I don't think it would be a financial issue.
come on Kimi, win this race![]()
Bookmarks