Thread: F14-T- Development & News

  1. #1021
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Lithuania
    Posts
    1,669
    Really don't get the car to be honest. Scarbs will have to dig deep on this one. We've kept pull-rod so the front is high, but the low nose just ruins it.

  2. #1022
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Castellon, Spain
    Posts
    2,868

  3. #1023
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Uppingham, UK
    Posts
    18,381
    Looks like they covered up the diffuser...


  4. #1024
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Godric's Hollow
    Posts
    10,215
    Impressive packaging, sidepods are so small.

  5. #1025
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    england
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by Sianellen View Post
    The front looks like a hoover hehe
    Maybe no coincidence, hoovers suck air so more air to the rear. The other types create a disturbance right in the middle. Its the arc behind the nose to the splitter which counts. I like it.

  6. #1026
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    3,447

    F14-T- Development & News

    It is understandable that everyone is frustrated already, it truly is the F138 with a new ugly nose. The car is still bulky, no air flow from the front wing and small side pods when they were thought to be bigger for increased cooling issues.

    Other teams seem to have took the new regs and started over with fresh, innovative ideas; where Ferrari seem to have just built off the f138.

    Let's hope it's fast and reliable.
    Last edited by ferrari1.8t; 25th January 2014 at 13:52.
    ~FORZA FERRARI~

  7. #1027
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    nameless city
    Posts
    5,462
    this year's cars are certainly something i must get used too. at least they all do not look the same
    not gonna change my profile picture

  8. #1028
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    221
    OK...that looks like a car of the 90's...stop complaining,if you have any better ideas go to the team and expess them.We are not aerodynamicists..or designers...they know better their job...they decided this shape,this low nose,so there is a reason for this.Do you think they are idiots?Hope,it will be a winner car.

  9. #1029
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Shropshire
    Posts
    3,180
    Quote Originally Posted by LongtimeFan View Post
    My god thats ugly :(

    MP4/29A - ugly
    E22 - ugly
    F14-T - ugly

    :(
    None of the cars this year are going to be very pretty, I'm just glad ours isn't the worst.

  10. #1030
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Brno
    Posts
    2,482
    lol, those faces speak for themselves... uhm how the are we supposed to win the championships with this?


  11. #1031
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,885
    The sidepod looks like its slightly smaller to me, I think... the UPS logo area looks flat in. Hopefully this means our engine cooling is more compact

  12. #1032
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Istanbul/Turkey
    Posts
    1,707
    What about the airflow ?


    Disappointing; 2009 to 2016...

  13. #1033
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    146
    I think it looks decent, reminds me of the GP3, F3 cars. The nose was a surprise, cant see how that will maximizing the air flow to the rear but we have to trust the engineers. I know this is just a launch spec but I hope they will take benfit of the Y75 winglet (monkey seat) that is still allowed to use. Another thing that caught my eye was the lack of cooling openings which could be a good thing or become a problem the first day in Jerez.
    Last edited by Avantifer12; 25th January 2014 at 13:56.

  14. #1034
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by ferrari1.8t View Post
    It is understandable that everyone is frustrated already, it truly is the F138 with a new ugly nose. The car is still bulky, no air flow from the front wing and small side pods when they were thought to be bigger for increased cooling issues.

    Other teams seem to have took the new regs and started over with fresh, innovative ideas; where Ferrari seem to have just built off the f138.

    What teams ?
    ::Richred:: signed in red!

  15. #1035
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,878
    Quote Originally Posted by Ste View Post
    Looks like they covered up the diffuser...

    We always do.

    IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT - ENZO FERRARI

  16. #1036
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Christchurch,UK
    Posts
    4,957
    Oh dear, pretty it's not, appears to me like a mish-mash of elements which just don't gel....hopefully it goes better than it looks.

  17. #1037
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by Sianellen View Post
    I really don't get it. How hard was it to just copy the Red Bull RB7 sidepods and enlarge the center opening? What's with those ambiguous sidepods, Ferrari? This thing is going to have traction problems again.

  18. #1038
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stowmarket. U.K
    Posts
    18,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbles View Post
    On the tech specs, it says the rear brakes are "Brake by Wire". Interesting...
    all teams will be using that. The ECU will be changing the brake bias instead of the driver. I spoke to Scarbs last weekend, and emailed me about it.
    CAVALLINO RAMPANTE PER SEMPRE

  19. #1039
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    nameless city
    Posts
    5,462
    Quote Originally Posted by wacc View Post
    lol, those faces speak for themselves... uhm how the are we supposed to win the championships with this?

    i dunno, don't think that Kimi even has different face expression, let's wait until first test before starting to judge..
    not gonna change my profile picture

  20. #1040
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    9,885
    Quote Originally Posted by faloupas View Post
    OK...that looks like a car of the 90's...stop complaining,if you have any better ideas go to the team and expess them.We are not aerodynamicists..or designers...they know better their job...they decided this shape,this low nose,so there is a reason for this.Do you think they are idiots?Hope,it will be a winner car.
    There are some basic aerodynamic concept that is easy to understand if you take the time to read them up. You don't need the simulator to tell that the nose blocks off any airflow.

    The nose is probably fake anyway. Still no image of Ferrari engine too. I guess that's how Ferrari roll, keep everything under wraps

  21. #1041
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyss4k View Post
    We always do.
    Yeah, we don't want others to know what a badly-designed diffuser looks like. It's a company secret.

  22. #1042
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by ferrari1.8t View Post
    Other teams seem to have took the new regs and started over with fresh, innovative ideas; where Ferrari seem to have just built off the f138.

    What teams ?
    ::Richred:: signed in red!

  23. #1043
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    651
    Let's put our faith in the engineers knowing what they are doing. How the heck does anyone here know anything about airflow. Don't we all think that the designers would have scrapped this idea if they knew it hurt the airflow... Amazing everyone jumps off a cliff. Remember when we thought the engines were going to sound terrible. Well that Mercedes video yesterday sounded pretty cool. NOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING RIGHT NOW! RELAX! HAVE A BEER!!!! WAIT FOR THE SHOW TO START!!!!
    Forza Ferrari!!

  24. #1044
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob View Post
    all teams will be using that. The ECU will be changing the brake bias instead of the driver. I spoke to Scarbs last weekend, and emailed me about it.
    I didn't know that. Thanks.

  25. #1045
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Bulvania
    Posts
    2,964
    Well, as long as it's quick and reliable I will consider it beautiful.

  26. #1046
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    EGYPT
    Posts
    749
    I am sure that is not the final nose why would they keep the high chassis if they will have a nose like this?!!
    In this case you just have the disadvantages, higher center of gravity and not much air over the floor towards the rear of the car.

  27. #1047
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    england
    Posts
    292
    any body think that the hole in the nose runs through the rest of the car? maybe for cooling or like an F-duct?

  28. #1048
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    4,456
    Quote Originally Posted by NickEice View Post
    Let's put our faith in the engineers knowing what they are doing. How the heck does anyone here know anything about airflow. Don't we all think that the designers would have scrapped this idea if they knew it hurt the airflow... Amazing everyone jumps off a cliff. Remember when we thought the engines were going to sound terrible. Well that Mercedes video yesterday sounded pretty cool. NOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING RIGHT NOW! RELAX! HAVE A BEER!!!! WAIT FOR THE SHOW TO START!!!!
    I think it's a bit too early to draw any conclusions already
    Maurizio Arrivabene fanpage:www.facebook.com/maurizioarrivabene

  29. #1049
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    rehoboth mass
    Posts
    217
    if you look at the nose of the car it does not meet the new rules so this will change.the tip has to be beyond the front wing there is a measurement that has to be met from the front axle to the tip

  30. #1050
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by OSS EL BOSS View Post
    I am sure that is not the final nose why would they keep the high chassis if they will have a nose like this?!!
    In this case you just have the disadvantages, higher center of gravity and not much air over the floor towards the rear of the car.
    Well, air moves over the nose AND around it. If there's space under the chassis, air will fill it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •